User talk:Lundimint: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:23, 14 February 2021

This is Lundimint's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruth A. Etzel (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Her books and articles are primary sources. Requires significant coverage in independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lundimint/sandbox/Ruth A. Etzel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Lundimint/sandbox/Ruth A. Etzel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lundimint! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI Refspamming

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning for conflict-of-interest reference spamming

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 [[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]
-===[[WP:COI]] Refspamming==
+==[[WP:COI]] Refspamming==
 [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to add inappropriate [[Wikipedia:External links|external links]] to Wikipedia, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. It is considered [[Wikipedia:Spam|spamming]] and [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#ADVERTISING|Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion]]. Because Wikipedia uses [[nofollow]] tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings.[[Category:User talk pages with Uw-spam3 notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!-- Template:uw-spam3 --> <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 22:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
+==Last warning for [[WP:COI|conflict-of-interest]] reference spamming==
+[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning''' the next time you insert a [[Wikipedia:Spam|spam]] link. Persistent spammers may have their websites [[Wikipedia:Spam blacklist|blacklisted]], preventing anyone from linking to them from all [[FoundationSite:our-work/wikimedia-projects|Wikimedia sites]] as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.[[Category:User talk pages with Uw-spam4 notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!-- Template:uw-spam4 --> <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 17:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)