User talk:Magioladitis

„,Woran arbeiten Sie?‘, wurde Herr K. gefragt. Herr K. antwortete: ,Ich habe viel Mühe, ich bereite meinen nächsten Irrtum vor.“

If you are interested in attending Wikimedia webinars please contact me via Wikipedia email

Corfupedia school project

New community imposed topic ban in effect

I regret to inform you, that you are now subject to the following topic ban.

Magioladitis is topic banned from initiating or participating in discussions concerning the amendment, removal, or replacement of WP:COSMETICBOT, or the in discussions concerning the impact of WP:COSMETICBOT on other bot operators (such as whether or not bot operators are allowed, or should be required, to perform WP:GENFIXES with their own bots, or theoretical bots which may be developped in the future). As an exception to this ban, he may make a single !vote with a short (<300 words) rationale if the discussion calls for !voting, and give single short replies (<300 words) to other editors when directly asked a question (1 reply per direct question). Magioladitis may, in good faith, seek specific clarifications on how to interpret COSMETICBOT for his own bots and projects he is involved with (such as WP:CHECKWIKI), but may only do so on his bots' talk page, at the relevant project's talk page (such as WT:CHECKWIKI or an appropriate subpage), or at WP:BOTN. In other words, asking questions like "When is CW Error #02 considered a cosmetic edit?" or "Should CW Error #02's priority be lowered to 'Medium' or 'Low' important?" is fine, asking/arguing "WP:COSMETICBOT hampers our ability to do WP:CHECKWIKI fixes, how can we ammend/fix/ignore WP:COSMETICBOT?" is not.

As the closer I have added the exception that you can finish any discussion already happening that you started in regards to this topic, until the discussion ends and gets archived.—CYBERPOWER (Around) 22:00, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

That was fast. Obviously, in the middle of the discussion while people supported me. Lol. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

I just hope that if the policy changes you ll come back to apologise Magioladitis (talk) 22:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

I have no opinion on the policy, or whether you should be topic banned, but I would be more than happy to see a discussion and close it, that overturns this ban.

Cyberpower678 the discussion is active and people already make proposals. So pro my arguements some against. People agreed that this dicussion is not a repaet to an older one. Whether the feel these changes are necessary or not it's a different thing. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:42, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Cyberpower678 I did not see the exception. Thanks. Apologies for my previous comment then. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:43, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

I try to be fair whenever possible. :-)—CYBERPOWER (Around) 22:46, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

You may wish to reconsider these edits. isaacl (talk) 06:51, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

isaacl I have the right to participate in the already existing discussions. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:20, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Lightmouse is a great example for me because I admired their work. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:34, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Your actions are of course up to you; please note the text of the topic ban just above has no exception for existing discussions. isaacl (talk) 04:18, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

isaacl per the closing admin "I have added the exception that you can finish any discussion already happening that you started in regards to this topic". Next paragraph. -- Magioladitis (talk) 06:14, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Ah, I missed that; thanks for the clarification. isaacl (talk) 06:53, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

sedat sönmz

Resolved

hello dear admin

as i was told you i going to introduce notable and famous Turkish business man after that American business man.

one of famous and notable Turkish business man who has not Wikipedia is sedat sönmez if you search his name on google you can see +200 news about him and his activities on the most famous Turkish news website database.

but since this article was created by one blocked user i cant create it now.

please help me and guide me to solve this problem

im waiting for you answering

best regards

Diegotoreto (talk) 08:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

FYI, this user has been blocked, mainly because they created the account Magioladitiss. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:30, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

DoRD Thanks. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:59, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Section header level

Template:Resoved FYI, a Yobot edit added an {{Empty section}} when the actual problem was that the section's header was level-3 instead of level-2. jnestorius^(talk) 17:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Which task id was that edit done under by the way? (Not listed in the summary). — xaosflux ^Talk 17:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Xaosflux, for what it's worth, it might not have had a task ID; even if it did, the edit was in Sept '16, well before the ArbCom case and revoking of extant Yobot tasks. Primefac (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Thanks for the quick reply, should have looked at that old date better - just disregard this! — xaosflux ^Talk 20:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Jnestorius it's an old bug. Please re-report if it re-appears. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:45, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

ISBN replacement

I thought you'd agreed to stop? Why can you not wait for the bots to finish this job? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:57, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Justlettersandnumbers My bot task is still pending. There are people who think that this ISBn replacement is a greta opportunity to do other tasks at the same time. I am not sure how this affects your job in Wikipedia. Only 300 pages in mainspace left. If you work with watchlist I suggest that you install WP:HIDEAWB. Moreover, if you check manually I fix ISBNs that Magic bot leaves unaffected. Fro instance, ISBNs inside hardard references etc. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:58, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

It affects me because my watchlist is swamped with your bot-like edits, which – unlike real bot edits – cannot be hidden with a simple click. And no, I'm not going to install a script just to hide edits by one user. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:05, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Checking all the pages manually if also helps me spot and fix things like this one. And as I said on some pages I fixed an ISBN after the bot failed too. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:06, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

So In most cases you won't "avoid" my editing even if the bot finishes. Because many ISBN will remain unfixed. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:07, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Justlettersandnumbers Another question: Since you deny to install a script to avoid edits, why should I stop over a single request. Why should not cooperate instead? -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:09, 30 June 2017 (UTC)