Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ArbClerkBot (talk | contribs) at 07:46, 23 September 2019 (Adding links to talk page sections (bot)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.

Announcement archives:
  • 0 (2008-12 – 2009-01)
  • 1 (to 2009-02)
  • 2 (to 2009-05)
  • 3 (to 2009-06)
  • 4 (to 2009-07)
  • 5 (to 2009-12)
  • 6 (to 2010-12)
  • 7 (to 2011-12)
  • 8 (to 2012-12)
  • 9 (to 2013-12)
  • 10 (to 2015-12)
  • 11 (to 2018-04)
  • 12 (to 2020-08)
  • 13 (to 2023-03)
  • 14 (to present)

Resignation of Courcelles

Effective immediately, Courcelles (talk · contribs) has resigned from the Arbitration Committee. He has also relinquished the CheckUser and Oversight permissions. The Committee sincerely thanks Courcelles for his service and wishes him well.

For the Arbitration Committee,

WormTT(talk) 22:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Resignation of Courcelles

Fram unbanned immediately (temporary injunction in Fram case)

The committee has resolved as a temporary injunction that:

Remedy 1a of this decision and its supporting principles and findings are passing, and so Fram shall be unbanned immediately, without awaiting the close of the case. The remainder of the decision remains pending. As the status of Fram's sysop rights has not been decided, Fram is not to be resysopped during this interim period.

For the Arbitration Committee WormTT(talk) 16:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Fram unbanned immediately (temporary injunction in Fram case)

An arbitration case regarding Fram has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  1. The Committee decides that Fram's ban was not required, and therefore vacates it.
  2. The behaviour shown in the case materials falls below the standards expected for an administrator. Accordingly, the committee takes over the decision to remove Fram's administrator tools. They may regain the administrative tools at any time via a successful request for adminship.
  3. A Request for Comment will be opened under the Arbitration space, and managed by the Arbitration Clerks. This RfC will focus on how harassment and private complaints should be handled in the future.

For the Arbitration Committee, SQLQuery me! 19:16, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fram

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

  1. Icewhiz and Volunteer Marek are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, each other anywhere on Wikipedia (subject to the ordinary exceptions).
  2. Icewhiz is topic-banned from the history of Poland during World War II, including the Holocaust in Poland. This topic ban may be appealed after one year has elapsed.
  3. Volunteer Marek is topic-banned from the history of Poland during World War II, including the Holocaust in Poland. This topic ban may be appealed after one year has elapsed.
  4. The sourcing expectations applied to the article Collaboration in German-occupied Poland are expanded and adapted to cover all articles on the topic of Polish history during World War II (1933-45), including the Holocaust in Poland. Only high quality sources may be used, specifically peer-reviewed scholarly journals, academically focused books by reputable publishers, and/or articles published by reputable institutions. English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones when available and of equal quality and relevance. Editors repeatedly failing to meet this standard may be topic-banned as an arbitration enforcement action.
  5. The committee acknowledges the lengthy delay in preparing the proposed decision for this case. We apologize to the case participants and to other editors interested in the topic area, and thank them for their patience.

For the Arbitration Committee, CThomas3 (talk) 19:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland closed

Resignation of SilkTork

Effective immediately, SilkTork (talk · contribs) has resigned from the Arbitration Committee. He has also relinquished the CheckUser and Oversight permissions. The Committee sincerely thanks SilkTork for his service and wishes him well.

For the Arbitration Committee,

WormTT(talk) 07:45, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Resignation of SilkTork