Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
2 June 2024
- diffhist m The Faders 21:01 +22 Onel5969 talk contribs (Disambiguating links to ABC Family (link changed to Freeform (TV channel)) using DisamAssist.)
- diffhist Bantam Press 02:56 +258 Iamamodforjellymario talk contribs (added links, added info.) Tag: Visual edit
1 June 2024
- diffhist m Glioblastoma 20:07 +2 Ira Leviton talk contribs (Fixed a reference. Please see Category:CS1 errors: dates.)
- diffhist Have I Got News for You 16:12 −158 2a00:23c5:e212:d01:54e0:212d:ec21:e20c talk (→History)
- diffhist Have I Got News for You 16:02 +358 2a00:23c5:e212:d01:54e0:212d:ec21:e20c talk
- diffhist Glioblastoma 12:54 +1,136 JoGuMa talk contribs (update on viral causes of glioblastoma) Tag: Visual edit
30 May 2024
- diffhist Noel's House Party 20:31 −120 69.131.80.236 talk (Grammar issues)
28 May 2024
- diffhist m BBC Radio 4 19:51 +2 Amogus Rundfunk talk contribs (Added bullet lists) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m BBC Radio 4 19:43 +105 Amogus Rundfunk talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m BBC Radio 4 19:41 +5 Amogus Rundfunk talk contribs (→Former frequencies: fixes) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist m BBC Radio 4 19:40 +227 Amogus Rundfunk talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Monmouthshire 17:13 −1 Woko Sapien talk contribs (→National representation)
- diffhist Monmouthshire 17:12 0 Woko Sapien talk contribs
27 May 2024
- diffhist The Guardian 22:09 −18 Jessintime talk contribs (not sure what the Japanese (?) text is for)
- diffhist The Guardian 21:31 −410 Eldomtom2 talk contribs (Undid revision 1225857345 by Mokadoshi (talk)it is a misinterpretation of the source, which only says it "struck a sour note", and if you actually read the editorial in question it's clear the guardian was not opposing the creation of the nhs)