User contributions for 108.17.137.227

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

17:4417:44, 18 December 2020 diff hist +525‎ Talk:Plasma cosmology ‎No edit summary
17:4117:41, 18 December 2020 diff hist −828‎ User talk:108.17.137.227 ‎ →‎March 2016 current Tag: Blanking
17:4017:40, 18 December 2020 diff hist +43‎ Plasma cosmology ‎ The only reason people have a problem here is because they assume I have some ulterior design to imply something other than what I said. I don't. Saying "overwhelming majority" is just a more accurate description than insisting on *absolute* agreement. Absolute agreement would be appropriate for flat-earth "models." It's not here. Do I think the tiny minority is right? No. But this is something which originated within the academy as a heterodox model, not something that popped up on 4Chan. Tags: Undo Reverted

03:3303:33, 11 December 2020 diff hist +43‎ Plasma cosmology ‎ That's a tautology. Mainstream cosmologists by definition reject non-mainstream cosmologies. The correct way to say that is to say it: "mainstream cosmologists." If that's your preferred phrasing, go for it. Old phrasing is imprecise at best, as it leaves one unable to distinguish "non-mainstream cosmologies" like hollow earth that have no professional support at all from something like steady-state cosmology or plasma cosmology- which have a very small base of support from actual cosmologists. Tags: Undo Reverted
02:1802:18, 11 December 2020 diff hist +43‎ Plasma cosmology ‎ Obviously, there are a very small minority of professionals who do not feel this way. Over-the-top assertions which are meant to exclude anyone who holds alternative models from being a "cosmologist" give the article a propagandistic feel that will immediately lead those interested in the topic for its own sake to click out. Yes, the overwhelming majority of cosmologists reject it. And that is what should be stated. Tag: Reverted

22:1622:16, 25 March 2016 diff hist −122‎ Light switch ‎ I added things that were truly about light switches and the way they work with the their origins. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit