User contributions for 2603:6010:11F0:3C0:4111:6F56:6969:3736
For 2603:6010:11F0:3C0:4111:6F56:6969:3736 talk block log logs filter log
6 October 2022
- 03:0803:08, 6 October 2022 diff hist −1,778 Literary criticism →Value of academic criticism: . Is there any other academic field article that includes “criticism” of the field as a concept? Criticism sections are only really standard for Wikipedia when there are numerous secondary sources that can be synthesized into a substantial, notable portion of the article. One or two authors offhand statements are not noteworthy for a criticism of an academic field of practice. Save those statements for each persons respective Wikipedia article. Tag: section blanking
- 03:0403:04, 6 October 2022 diff hist +90 Talk:Literary criticism →‘value of academic criticism’ section
- 03:0303:03, 6 October 2022 diff hist +216 Talk:Literary criticism →Literary criticism criticism: Reply Tag: Reply
- 02:4902:49, 6 October 2022 diff hist −36 Literary criticism Book reviewing isn’t mentioned anywhere else, and it is not relevant to criticism vs theory
- 00:3500:35, 6 October 2022 diff hist +506 Talk:Nathaniel Hawthorne →Whipple: new section Tag: New topic
- 00:2700:27, 6 October 2022 diff hist −1 Nathaniel Hawthorne →Middle years
 | This is the contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |