User contributions for 31.185.216.157

4 February 2014

• 19:1719:17, 4 February 2014 diff hist +3‎ Talk:United Nations ‎ →‎UN Motto
• 19:1619:16, 4 February 2014 diff hist −2‎ Talk:United Nations ‎ →‎UN Motto
• 19:1319:13, 4 February 2014 diff hist +16‎ Commonwealth (U.S. state) ‎No edit summary
• 15:3815:38, 4 February 2014 diff hist +25‎ Charter school ‎ An individual charter school, on its own, is not an "alternative education system" though that is what this sentence means as it stands. Rather, charter schools as a concept are an example of alternative education. I have restructured the lede accordingly
• 14:5814:58, 4 February 2014 diff hist +1,148‎ Talk:United Nations ‎No edit summary

1 February 2014

• 20:1120:11, 1 February 2014 diff hist 0‎ United Progressive Alliance ‎ Undid revision 593453053 by 71.99.197.144 (talk) reverted vandalism.
• 13:4313:43, 1 February 2014 diff hist −167‎ Blender (software) ‎ →‎User interface: An internet forum is not a reliable source.
• 13:2413:24, 1 February 2014 diff hist 0‎ Graphics tablet ‎ →‎History: This device was not a "tablet" in form.
• 13:0313:03, 1 February 2014 diff hist +8‎ Non-photorealistic rendering ‎ →‎History
• 12:5212:52, 1 February 2014 diff hist −198‎ Blender (software) ‎ →‎Features: Another wiki that anyone can edit can hardly be a reliable source.
• 12:2112:21, 1 February 2014 diff hist −7‎ City commission government ‎ Fixed link.

31 January 2014

• 20:0720:07, 31 January 2014 diff hist −13‎ A Song of Ice and Fire ‎ Why's this linked to the Feminism article? Feminism is not nearly the only reason for a diverse portrayal of women, and praise for the same, in fiction. There are any number of good reasons for it and it's presumptuous to assume it is a Feminist statement

30 January 2014

• 12:3912:39, 30 January 2014 diff hist −228‎ Women and children first ‎ Removed some blatant POV, OR commentary. This is around sourced material (the Uppsala University study) however the commentary I have removed is both original (not from that study) and clearly biased - 2 POV general statements not sourced to anywhere.
• 12:2912:29, 30 January 2014 diff hist +181‎ Masculism ‎ Added additional definition that was already in one of the existing citations (the Blackwell Western Philosophy dictionary).

28 January 2014

• 19:2019:20, 28 January 2014 diff hist −6‎ As We May Think ‎ →‎Concept realization
• 19:1319:13, 28 January 2014 diff hist +211‎ As We May Think ‎ →‎Concept realization
• 19:1019:10, 28 January 2014 diff hist +8‎ As We May Think ‎ →‎Concept realization
• 09:0209:02, 28 January 2014 diff hist −292‎ Cyberpunk derivatives ‎ →‎Retrofuturistic derivatives: Deleted this section - a single example does not establish a whole derivative style. If a single author coins a new -punk term to describe only their work, should we put it here? We should expect to see more than 1 work. Tag: section blanking
• 08:5808:58, 28 January 2014 diff hist −47‎ Cyberpunk derivatives ‎ The first two Bioshocks are more Decopunk than Dieselpunk. Yes, they are set after the 1950s, but Rapture was built during the 50s according to 40s aesthetics. Rapture is largely an Art Deco city in its styling, as many reviewers have commented.
• 08:1608:16, 28 January 2014 diff hist +158‎ Talk:Neomercantilism ‎ →‎Delete this article
• 08:1408:14, 28 January 2014 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Neomercantilism ‎ →‎Delete this article
• 08:1308:13, 28 January 2014 diff hist +326‎ Talk:Neomercantilism ‎ →‎Delete this article
• 08:0908:09, 28 January 2014 diff hist +22‎ Neomercantilism ‎ See talk.

27 January 2014

• 11:5411:54, 27 January 2014 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Chauvinism ‎ →‎Put details of "male chauvinism" and other specific types into one or more separate articles.
• 11:5311:53, 27 January 2014 diff hist +910‎ Talk:Chauvinism ‎ →‎Put details of "male chauvinism" and other specific types into one or more separate articles.
• 11:4011:40, 27 January 2014 diff hist −963‎ Chauvinism ‎ Introducing much needed NPOV to this POV section by actually attributing views, rather than indulging in POV by stating them as if they were absolute fact. The "Role of Women" section is really an original interpretation of sources, so I'm removing it.
• 11:1611:16, 27 January 2014 diff hist +361‎ Talk:Fascism ‎ →‎Clarification needed for the use of "radical"
• 11:0911:09, 27 January 2014 diff hist +7‎ Talk:Fascism ‎ →‎Clarification needed for the use of "radical"
• 11:0811:08, 27 January 2014 diff hist +1,842‎ Talk:Fascism ‎ →‎Clarification needed for the use of "radical"
• 10:2910:29, 27 January 2014 diff hist +34‎ Neomercantilism ‎No edit summary
• 10:2810:28, 27 January 2014 diff hist +270‎ Talk:Neomercantilism ‎ →‎Delete this article
• 10:2310:23, 27 January 2014 diff hist +2,181‎ Talk:Neomercantilism ‎No edit summary
• 09:5809:58, 27 January 2014 diff hist −124‎ Neomercantilism ‎ What? The pre-industrial governments of classical mercantilism had no option but to accept markets in their domestic economies, there were no Renaissance planning depts telling the village butcher and tavern what they could charge, nor anything like that.
• 09:2409:24, 27 January 2014 diff hist +133‎ Mercantilism ‎ These just seem like generic protectionist arguments, where is the evidence they are specifically "neomercantilist"?
• 09:1309:13, 27 January 2014 diff hist −299‎ Mercantilism ‎ Removing this until it's better explained because at the moment it verges on meaningless (poor grammar doesn't help). Which corporate entities are favored and which hindered and why? Why is this "Reverse-mercantilism"? What regulations and taxes are used?