User contributions for 86.17.152.168
For 86.17.152.168 talk block log logs filter log
22 July 2015
- 13:0613:06, 22 July 2015 diff hist +340 Talk:Edgington v Fitzmaurice If there is no response, then I might fix it myself, I suppose . . . . . .
25 June 2015
26 May 2015
- 01:1101:11, 26 May 2015 diff hist +2 Quintinshill rail disaster http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/BoT_Quin1915.pdf
- 00:1700:17, 26 May 2015 diff hist −25 Quintinshill rail disaster http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/BoT_Quin1915.pdf
- 00:1300:13, 26 May 2015 diff hist +222 Quintinshill rail disaster http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/BoT_Quin1915.pdf (perhaps this is already referenced?) Tag: extraneous markup
25 May 2015
- 11:0411:04, 25 May 2015 diff hist 0 Quintinshill rail disaster The collisions at Quintinshill were clearly a disaster; looking at causes as fully as possible increases the chances of future prevention (IMHO)
- 10:5910:59, 25 May 2015 diff hist +904 Talk:Quintinshill rail disaster →I changed my mind about being content, as it is indisputable (very brave) that Lt.Col Druitt's choice of words should be reflected in the article (collision v. accident): new section
- 10:3610:36, 25 May 2015 diff hist +4 Talk:Quintinshill rail disaster →This is the 100th anniversary - let us look at the accident more objectively. 'Cause' is typically multi-layered, and multi-factorial.
- 10:3210:32, 25 May 2015 diff hist +1,914 Talk:Quintinshill rail disaster →This is the 100th anniversary - let us look at the accident more objectively. 'Cause' is typically multi-layered, and multi-factorial.
22 May 2015
- 03:2903:29, 22 May 2015 diff hist +1,060 Talk:Quintinshill rail disaster →This is the 100th anniversary - let us look at the accident more objectively. 'Cause' is typically multi-layered, and multi-factorial.: new section
- 03:1003:10, 22 May 2015 diff hist +189 Quintinshill rail disaster Not appropriate to take such a simplistic view of 'cause' - this is not a newspaper article!
17 May 2015
- 04:4504:45, 17 May 2015 diff hist +98 Hip replacement why mention "runner-up" when he has won eight?
16 May 2015
- 11:1111:11, 16 May 2015 diff hist +1,360 Talk:Scottish independence →Wording in History Section: Misleading = Yes, but confusing = No
27 March 2015
- 06:2606:26, 27 March 2015 diff hist +635 Talk:Demographics of India →Very interesting article: new section
- 06:1806:18, 27 March 2015 diff hist +8 Demographics of India "inclusive" does not make sense semantically or gramatically (unless there is a particular usage in India?)
22 February 2015
- 14:4414:44, 22 February 2015 diff hist +717 User talk:Drchriswilliams →Message for Chris (re EE) ~ Alasdair writing: new section
- 14:3314:33, 22 February 2015 diff hist 0 Employee engagement I had a spare semi-colon, so I slipped it in to add some variety to the sentence lengths
- 14:3114:31, 22 February 2015 diff hist 0 Employee engagement "lexicon" is the right word; "armoury" was just plain wrong (sometimes you mislay words when you need them, I guess)
- 14:2814:28, 22 February 2015 diff hist +1,058 Talk:Employee engagement →Article lead
- 14:1314:13, 22 February 2015 diff hist +1,150 Talk:Employee engagement →Please don't be lazy, DrChris . . . .
- 13:5113:51, 22 February 2015 diff hist +1,668 Talk:Employee engagement →Article lead
- 13:2113:21, 22 February 2015 diff hist +154 Employee engagement Who is the target audience: people who are familiar (or unfamiliar) with the term?
- 13:1213:12, 22 February 2015 diff hist +1,711 Talk:Employee engagement →Please don't be lazy, DrChris . . . .: new section
- 12:1212:12, 22 February 2015 diff hist +1,573 Talk:Employee engagement Interesting debate about the accuracy of the article's intro
- 11:4011:40, 22 February 2015 diff hist +182 Employee engagement Andrew doesn't think the intro needs improving, whereas I do. Perhaps someone else should distil an intro from the article?
21 February 2015
- 17:1817:18, 21 February 2015 diff hist +1,374 Talk:Employee engagement →Elevating EE to a 'property of the relationship' is tending toward original research (salted by some POV perhaps) . . .
- 16:4616:46, 21 February 2015 diff hist −4 Employee engagement ????
- 16:4616:46, 21 February 2015 diff hist +304 Employee engagement Striving for an improvement to the intro. on this important topic (see Talk)
13 February 2015
- 12:3112:31, 13 February 2015 diff hist +707 Talk:Employee engagement →Elevating EE to a 'property of the relationship' is tending toward original research (salted by some POV perhaps) . . .
- 12:1412:14, 13 February 2015 diff hist +63 Talk:Employee engagement →Elevating EE to a 'property of the relationship' is tending toward original research . . .
12 February 2015
- 18:4918:49, 12 February 2015 diff hist +1,527 Talk:Employee engagement →Elevating EE to a 'property of the relationship' is tending toward original research . . .: new section
- 18:0418:04, 12 February 2015 diff hist +108 Employee engagement I fully agree that 'emergent property' was wrong (even tho' it was my edit) but looking at Reissner and Pagan (2013) the locus of EE is still being vigorously debated.
1 January 2015
- 12:1512:15, 1 January 2015 diff hist +41 The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face (disambiguation) He WAS a folk musician (a leader in the 'folk revival' many people would say), but that doesn't make this song a folk song, does it?
15 December 2014
- 12:5512:55, 15 December 2014 diff hist −919 Synergy Making bread is NOT a good example of synergy, and this undermines the rest of the previous text.
- 11:1711:17, 15 December 2014 diff hist +637 Talk:Randomness →Is randomness a technical term? If it is, does it use differ between Maths and Physics? The only valuable stuff in this article is in the talk pages - please, someone, put it down and start again (assuming there is consensus that it is a term): new
14 December 2014
- 18:1018:10, 14 December 2014 diff hist +929 Talk:Social complexity →Title is not very helpful: new section
- 17:1217:12, 14 December 2014 diff hist +2 Talk:Complexity →Is there really a distinct CONCEPT that has the simple one-word label: "complexity"
- 17:1117:11, 14 December 2014 diff hist +1,593 Talk:Complexity →Is there really a distinct CONCEPT that has the simple one-word label: "complexity"
11 December 2014
- 12:5512:55, 11 December 2014 diff hist +765 Talk:Complexity →Is there really a distinct CONCEPT that has the simple one-word label: "complexity"
- 10:3110:31, 11 December 2014 diff hist +358 Complex No edit summary
- 10:2110:21, 11 December 2014 diff hist +9 Complexity No edit summary
- 09:3709:37, 11 December 2014 diff hist +829 Talk:Complexity →Is there really a distinct CONCEPT that has the simple one-word label: "complexity": new section
7 September 2014
- 14:3514:35, 7 September 2014 diff hist −28 Talk:Motivation →Replaced Intro
- 14:3314:33, 7 September 2014 diff hist +57 Motivation having trouble with the citation . . . . (motivation to succeed is running out for just now)
- 14:2814:28, 7 September 2014 diff hist −2 Motivation →References
- 14:2714:27, 7 September 2014 diff hist +171 Motivation →References Tag: reference list removal
- 14:2414:24, 7 September 2014 diff hist +1,710 Talk:Motivation →Replaced Intro: new section
- 14:0614:06, 7 September 2014 diff hist +11 Motivation No edit summary
- 14:0514:05, 7 September 2014 diff hist +28 Motivation Given how much detail is included later, it is important to highlight the nature of the concept
24 July 2014
- 14:2414:24, 24 July 2014 diff hist +141 Talk:Badminton at the 2014 Commonwealth Games – Mixed team No edit summary
 | This is the contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |