User contributions for 88.77.186.3
For 88.77.186.3 talk block log logs filter log
25 January 2011
- 06:4806:48, 25 January 2011 diff hist +12 Talk:Thought disorder another typo.
- 06:4806:48, 25 January 2011 diff hist +55 Talk:Thought disorder Typo.
- 06:4606:46, 25 January 2011 diff hist +611 Talk:Thought disorder →Diagnostic Issues - NPOV
- 06:4106:41, 25 January 2011 diff hist +1,826 Talk:Thought disorder →Important point about when it is a disorder and when not!: new section
- 06:1506:15, 25 January 2011 diff hist +198 Post-nasal drip →Treatment
- 06:0806:08, 25 January 2011 diff hist +8 Clanging Why is it patently absurd? What of it is meant to be absurd? A statement requires reasoning. Such killer phrases are unwelcome here.
- 05:0105:01, 25 January 2011 diff hist −35 Psychosis Are you seriously expecting a citation on the fact that recovery from mental illness is possible? Well then cite ME, saying that I know many who DID recover. Or do you need a “authority”? (=fallacy!)
- 04:5404:54, 25 January 2011 diff hist −8 Psychosis If they have paranormal beliefs, they are by definition not healthy anymore! They don’t have a full grown psychosis, but it’s not an on/off switch. It’s a gradient. and they are somewhere on the 40%.
- 04:3404:34, 25 January 2011 diff hist +170 Psychosis If we let this logically faulty paragraph stand, we at least have to add this. I’m for removal or complete rewrite though.
- 04:2704:27, 25 January 2011 diff hist −1,653 Psychosis Religious and „paranormal“ experiences ARE types of schizophrenia! Light ones, but still. Also „it has been argued“ = weasel words. I suspect a religious nut behind the paragraph, and remove it.