User contributions for 98.206.14.11

30 May 2024

• 13:1613:16, 30 May 2024 diff hist −1‎ Millard Fuller ‎ →‎Recognition: Copy edit. Removed an unnecessary carriage return that had separated a citation from its sentence. Note, the {{refimprove}} issue noted for the one paragraph above is a general problem of the article. It appears that the text was posted en masse, unsourced, and that sourcing has begun after-the-fact, leading to sparse sourcing with incomplete coverage. Whole blocks of material are suspect in terms of WP:VER, WP:OR, and WP:NPOV. current
• 13:1313:13, 30 May 2024 diff hist +161‎ Millard Fuller ‎ →‎Koinonia Farm

25 May 2024

• 05:2605:26, 25 May 2024 diff hist +972‎ Klaus Barbie ‎ →‎Extradition, trial and death: Still checking and completing appearing sources. Completed the Eytan, Saxon, and L'avocat de la terreur citations. Noting a variety of places where incomplete information makes information unverifiable, or where poorer than scholarly sources are used to support appearing information. current
• 04:3004:30, 25 May 2024 diff hist +209‎ Klaus Barbie ‎ →‎Extradition, trial and death: Noting that important purported factual, non-sky-is-ble statements are, as presented, not verifiable (and so violate WP:VER).
• 04:2704:27, 25 May 2024 diff hist +54‎ Klaus Barbie ‎ →‎Extradition, trial and death: This important subject deserves sources better than self-published blogs at AOL.
• 04:1604:16, 25 May 2024 diff hist +471‎ Maria Altmann ‎ Adding the superb source, Renold, Chechi, Bandle & Renold (2013), at Platform ArThemis (unige.ch/art-adr), to further readong, so it might be further extracted to improve this and other articles. current
• 04:1404:14, 25 May 2024 diff hist +223‎ Maria Altmann ‎ →‎Background to the Klimt case: Completed the Platform ArThemis (unige.ch/art-adr) citation.
• 04:1104:11, 25 May 2024 diff hist +24‎ Maria Altmann ‎ →‎Background to the Klimt case: Noting that there is no external link to any Supreme Court case.
• 04:0204:02, 25 May 2024 diff hist −24‎ Maria Altmann ‎ →‎Early life: Copy edit. Removed duplicated markup language.
• 04:0104:01, 25 May 2024 diff hist +348‎ Maria Altmann ‎ Noting that the period photograph attributed to Altmann nee Bloch-Bauer contains no metadata / information linking it to the title subject, and thus could be anyone (or indeed, if of the title subject, is WP:OR, or worse, plagiarised).
• 03:4803:48, 25 May 2024 diff hist +890‎ Maria Altmann ‎ Completed the Glaberson NYT citation, and the Collins book citation, removing its repeated reference entries for a single complete one (though all mentions need page numbers). Otherwise, there are far too many violations of WP:VERIFY and WP:OR. Non-sky-is-blue historical material cannot be based on editor knowledge. Fact by fact it must be supported by third-party, independent sources.
• 02:3402:34, 25 May 2024 diff hist +50‎ Klaus Barbie ‎ →‎Manhunt: Noting another entire paragraph purporting non-sky-is-blue facts that are presented without sources.

21 May 2024

• 12:0812:08, 21 May 2024 diff hist +31‎ Hock Tan ‎ The 3-6 year datedness of the information of this article is a lifetime in business... (3 years in terms of most recent references, 6 years in terms of the lead and compensation information).
• 02:0102:01, 21 May 2024 diff hist +18‎ User talk:Melcous ‎ →‎TY for recent attention
• 02:0002:00, 21 May 2024 diff hist +1‎ User talk:Melcous ‎ →‎TY for recent attention
• 02:0002:00, 21 May 2024 diff hist +774‎ User talk:Melcous ‎ →‎Flagging statements about whether someone was a signatory to a letter as "possibly WP:UNDUE"
• 00:5900:59, 21 May 2024 diff hist −4,644‎ Miroslav Volf ‎ Undid revision 1224879190 by 98.206.14.11 (talk). Undoing because I inadvertently overwrote an edit conflict. Tag: Undo
• 00:5800:58, 21 May 2024 diff hist +4,644‎ Miroslav Volf ‎ Moved section issues to top of article. Whole of article is at issue. Also marking completely unsourced sections. See last edit summary regarding the overaching major issues of unsourced content, the preponderant use of self-authored sources (where ones professional workplace bios and CVs are self-authored), and its leaning, as a consequence, toward adulatory rather than objective and encyclopeic. [Is this written by a former student of the article subject?] Tag: Reverted
• 00:2800:28, 21 May 2024 diff hist +266‎ Miroslav Volf ‎ I'm saddened, apologetic but moved to post this edit. While deeply respecting Volf and his work, I fault the current, overall article content—so much written other than from stated sources—and its tone, which leans very much toward adulatory/promotional, rather than objective. Articles are often written by those who believe in their subjects, so supportive content is understandable. In this case a line is crossed. Remove unsourced. Impersonalise. Rewrite per third-party, independent sources, Tag: possible unreferenced addition to BLP

19 May 2024

• 15:3415:34, 19 May 2024 diff hist +256‎ Heretics of Dune ‎ →‎Reception: Added the Kirkus review as Further reading, to initiate that section, so that furthrr sources may be presented there for inclusion in the article. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 15:3215:32, 19 May 2024 diff hist −237‎ Heretics of Dune ‎ →‎Reception: Removed duplicate full citation. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 15:3115:31, 19 May 2024 diff hist +199‎ Heretics of Dune ‎ Added a sourced statement from the article relevant to the lead summary. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 15:2515:25, 19 May 2024 diff hist +249‎ Heretics of Dune ‎ →‎Plot summary: Added source to statement in plot summary. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 15:1515:15, 19 May 2024 diff hist +565‎ Heretics of Dune ‎ →‎Reception: Added a Kirkus review to the section on the novel's reception. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 14:5414:54, 19 May 2024 diff hist +116‎ Heretics of Dune ‎ →‎Characters: First of two edits to create a section of the novel's characters. See next edit. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 14:5014:50, 19 May 2024 diff hist +36‎ Heretics of Dune ‎ →‎Plot summary: Noting, in accord with article tags, that this section is far too long. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 14:4914:49, 19 May 2024 diff hist −54‎ Heretics of Dune ‎ Revised content of lead rewrite tag in light of recent restructuring edits. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 14:3314:33, 19 May 2024 diff hist +17‎ Heretics of Dune ‎ Second edit to begin to move the lead into a form that actually summarizes the content of the article. This was accomplished by moving the earlier lead's plot summary material (long second paragraph) into the actual plot summary section. This will create redundancies there, but it's best that the lead be valid and compliant; redundancies in the plot summary section existed even before this addition, and all can be rectified there together. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 14:3014:30, 19 May 2024 diff hist +18‎ Heretics of Dune ‎ →‎Expanded plot summary: First of two edits to remove non-lead content from lead. Please do not revert until you see the second edit. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 14:2614:26, 19 May 2024 diff hist −1‎ Heretics of Dune ‎ copy edit, removed extraneous space Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 14:2414:24, 19 May 2024 diff hist +2‎ Heretics of Dune ‎ copy edit, corrected mistyped character Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 14:2314:23, 19 May 2024 diff hist +223‎ Heretics of Dune ‎ Noting failure of lead in serving as a summary of source-based factual content regarding a best-selling book Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 03:0903:09, 19 May 2024 diff hist +42‎ Rebecca Root ‎ →‎Biography: WP:VER/WP:OR violations. Someone is presenting information they know as encyclopedic. The first paragraph is not sky-is-blue, and so requires a basis in sources. Likewise the closing sentence. At same time, the presented citations should be checked that they actually support content appearing. Often, when citations are added late, they do not properly cover the content of the sentences to which they are affixed. current

15 May 2024

• 03:3403:34, 15 May 2024 diff hist +375‎ Agatha Christie's Marple ‎ Finally, noting that most release dates for DVD media are poorly sourced.
• 03:2603:26, 15 May 2024 diff hist +236‎ Agatha Christie's Marple ‎ →‎Ratings: Hid the barb.co.uk web link, because it goes to the hope page of a website, and not to any relevant information about any statement of section content. Otherwise noting that apart from that faux source, there is no traceable, verifiable citation for these purported factual, historic, non-sky-is-blue table entries. When correcting, also please make explicit/clear, which of the various productions/airings/audiences, to which the viewerships numbers pertain, please.
• 03:1903:19, 15 May 2024 diff hist +417‎ Agatha Christie's Marple ‎ →‎Location: And again and again. (Besides the citations needed, an issue of a run-on sentence, which cannot be deciphered without source, is marked by an in-text (<!--, etc.) note.
• 03:0703:07, 15 May 2024 diff hist +41‎ Agatha Christie's Marple ‎ →‎Worldwide distribution: And bloody again.
• 03:0603:06, 15 May 2024 diff hist +187‎ Agatha Christie's Marple ‎ →‎Awards and nominations: Noting another pair of purported factual, non sky-is-blue sentences, as being unsourced.
• 03:0303:03, 15 May 2024 diff hist +31‎ Agatha Christie's Marple ‎ Making clear the issue of poor/absent sourcing is systemic and serious.
• 03:0003:00, 15 May 2024 diff hist +39‎ Agatha Christie's Marple ‎ →‎Recurring characters: We are allowing this subject of Agatha Christie works to devolve into a second place for IMDB and blog-type originsl research publication. Is no registered editor with commitment to WP:VER attending here?
• 02:5702:57, 15 May 2024 diff hist +163‎ Agatha Christie's Marple ‎ →‎Plot outline: Noting a non-plot statement that requires a source.
• 02:5402:54, 15 May 2024 diff hist +65‎ A Caribbean Mystery ‎ →‎Publication history: Noting this too is unsourced WP:OR.
• 02:5102:51, 15 May 2024 diff hist +217‎ A Caribbean Mystery ‎ →‎Literary significance and reception: Slight reordering of reviews so that they are in the order of appearance, and edit to 1990 appreciation sentence, to make clear it was not a contemporaneous review. Moved longer quotes to blockquote format.
• 02:4302:43, 15 May 2024 diff hist 0‎ A Caribbean Mystery ‎ →‎Literary significance and reception: Hiding book wrapper laudations from sight, until they are turned into prose and properly sourced. Articles as dumbing grounds for edits violating WP:VERIFY need to cease here.
• 02:4002:40, 15 May 2024 diff hist +74‎ A Caribbean Mystery ‎ Returned three 2018 {{cn}} tags improperly removed by Prairieplant on 2 August 2022, and added the overarching article refimprove tag.
• 02:3102:31, 15 May 2024 diff hist +1,489‎ A Caribbean Mystery ‎ →‎Adaptations: NO MATERIAL ADDED UNSOURCED; WORK CALLS ATTENTION TO PRE-EXISTING UNSOURCED CONTENT—frankly, the whole bloody non-ecyclopedic mess. (Entire section violates both WP:VERIFY and WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH.) A registered editor should move content to Talk, delete whole thing, and state why—so editor committed to WIkipedia principle of verifiability can begin again. Note, otherwise, edited to move late insertions into relevant points in chronology, and hid IMDB citations as improper.
• 01:5201:52, 15 May 2024 diff hist +24‎ A Caribbean Mystery ‎ →‎References in other works: WP:OR noted. We don't speak from ur knowledge experience, as bloggers do. We write from sources.

14 May 2024

• 20:0120:01, 14 May 2024 diff hist 0‎ Tramadol ‎ Moved the natural product controversy to the chemistry section, as that is the nature of its sources, and the proper context for the argument.
• 19:5819:58, 14 May 2024 diff hist 0‎ Tramadol ‎ →‎Discrepant reports on natural agency: Copy edit. Corrected date in text to publication date of appended source.
• 19:5419:54, 14 May 2024 diff hist +606‎ User talk:A876 ‎ →‎ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message