User contributions for CarlFilip19
A user with 60 edits. Account created on 3 December 2023.
27 May 2024
- 13:2713:27, 27 May 2024 diff hist +1 m Dan Povenmire Fixing a bug by making a dummy edit. Apparently, despite that an appropriate protection template (pp-vandalism) was used here, this article was still put under Category:Wikipedia_pages_with_incorrect_protection_templates. I have shown a preview, and editing this page in any way fixes this bug.
- 12:2412:24, 27 May 2024 diff hist +110 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase →The Lorax (film): Reply Tag: Reply
- 11:1811:18, 27 May 2024 diff hist +1,126 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase Requesting protection for The Lorax (film)
26 May 2024
- 13:2213:22, 26 May 2024 diff hist +1,494 Wikipedia talk:Vandalism →I do not think that all humorous writing is vandalism, and this page could acknowledge that.: new section Tag: New topic
18 May 2024
- 14:2414:24, 18 May 2024 diff hist +262 User talk:North8000 No edit summary
17 May 2024
- 21:3521:35, 17 May 2024 diff hist +614 User talk:North8000 →Adding a section to a closed discussion.: new section Tag: New topic
- 18:1018:10, 17 May 2024 diff hist −42 Talk:Jordan Peterson Making it so that the template about gender-related disputes does not appear twice (like it has done before this edit). If you revert this edit, use the "Show preview" thing and make sure that redundant templates are dealt with.
16 May 2024
- 07:2007:20, 16 May 2024 diff hist +245 Pop-up book An entry about a work of fiction that has a pop-up book be a defining feature of its narrative, rather than just having a pop-up book exist in a work.
11 May 2024
- 22:1322:13, 11 May 2024 diff hist +25 Killer Bean Forever Sorry, sources should be provided for the release dates, and maybe for the summaries. Well... those shorts are obscure, so I think info about them would be challenged.
8 May 2024
- 21:2021:20, 8 May 2024 diff hist +32 Nora (cat) Rest in peace, pianist.
- 21:1521:15, 8 May 2024 diff hist +129 User talk:Xeroctic →Regarding your edit of "Wikipedia:Deleted articles with freaky titles" at 28 April 2024: Reply current Tag: Reply
- 20:2820:28, 8 May 2024 diff hist +753 User talk:Xeroctic →Regarding your edit of "Wikipedia:Deleted articles with freaky titles" at 28 April 2024: new section Tag: New topic
- 13:5713:57, 8 May 2024 diff hist −26 2MASX J22550681+0058396 This article is not an orphan for now. The Lenticular_galaxy, Low-ionization_nuclear_emission-line_region, and Starburst_galaxy articles refer to it.
- 13:5713:57, 8 May 2024 diff hist +62 Starburst galaxy Fixing that the 2MASX J22550681+0058396 article is an orphan. Tag: Reverted
- 13:5613:56, 8 May 2024 diff hist +290 Low-ionization nuclear emission-line region Fixing that the 2MASX J22550681+0058396 article is an orphan. Tag: Reverted
- 13:5613:56, 8 May 2024 diff hist +113 Lenticular galaxy Fixing that the 2MASX J22550681+0058396 article is an orphan. Tag: Reverted
7 May 2024
- 15:1515:15, 7 May 2024 diff hist −645 Cr1TiKaL The "unreliable source?" tags are probably right. I am reading the page about perennial sources for this purpose. Dexerto is a sketchy case in the yellow zone, but it is redundant to the more reliable Dot Esports that is used multiple times in this article. Yes, Sportskeeda is in the red zone and therefore a generally unreliable source. The reason? Most of the content is user-written with a lack of editorial oversight. I am being bold.
4 May 2024
- 17:2817:28, 4 May 2024 diff hist −32 7 EAO Alliance This article is not an orphan for now. The List of ethnic armed organisations in Myanmar article links to it.
- 17:2717:27, 4 May 2024 diff hist +1,388 List of ethnic armed organisations in Myanmar Fixing that 7 EAO Alliance is an orphan. Hehe, sounds like "Karen."
- 17:1317:13, 4 May 2024 diff hist −52 7 Dollar Taxi This article is not an orphan for now. The Music of Switzerland article refers to it. And this time I am not missing any curly brackets. current
- 17:1117:11, 4 May 2024 diff hist +334 Music of Switzerland Fixing that 7 Dollar Taxi is an orphan. How well did I insert the information into this article? current
- 16:5816:58, 4 May 2024 diff hist −2 m Undead (Yoasobi song) Missed two curly brackets in a hasty edit.
- 16:5816:58, 4 May 2024 diff hist −20 Undead (Yoasobi song) Oh, currently this article only has one issue, so the "multiple issues" thing is not needed. Sorry for missing that.
- 16:5616:56, 4 May 2024 diff hist −25 Undead (Yoasobi song) Not an orphan for now. The Yoasobi discography article links to it. I find it tricky to spell "Yoasobi", by the way.
- 16:5516:55, 4 May 2024 diff hist +135 Yoasobi discography Fixing that "Undead" (Yoasobi song) is an orphan. Since this is an upcoming song, I do not know about its position on the billboards. Tag: Reverted
27 April 2024
- 11:1511:15, 27 April 2024 diff hist +329 Talk:StoneToss →Is it okay to add more images to this article, like StoneToss's profile picture?: Reply Tag: Reply
26 April 2024
- 23:4423:44, 26 April 2024 diff hist +778 Wikipedia:Deleted articles with freaky titles Haha.
22 April 2024
- 17:2017:20, 22 April 2024 diff hist +121 Talk:StoneToss →Is it okay to add more images to this article, like StoneToss's profile picture?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:5216:52, 22 April 2024 diff hist +717 Talk:StoneToss →Is it okay to add more images to this article, like StoneToss's profile picture?: new section Tag: New topic
20 April 2024
- 15:5715:57, 20 April 2024 diff hist +513 List of Donkey Kong characters Chunky is not dead. Hehe. I do not see certain paragraphs here be sourced, especially when cameo appearances are harder to find than normal appearances. According to Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources, Screen Rant is in the yellow zone, being considered okay for sourcing information about entertainment. Is there original research in this new paragraph? I do not know. The source says that he can be seen in the arena, not that he can be seen during a scene with the arena. But okay.
25 March 2024
- 22:2222:22, 25 March 2024 diff hist +1,839 User talk:Oshwah →Regarding templates for protected pages: Reply Tag: Reply
20 March 2024
- 13:4013:40, 20 March 2024 diff hist −8 m False imprisonment "shopkeeper detains unreasonably detains the suspect" Fixing a strange setting of words.
19 March 2024
- 13:1713:17, 19 March 2024 diff hist +188 User talk:CarlFilip19 →Semi-protection templates: Reply Tag: Reply
- 08:5608:56, 19 March 2024 diff hist +1,349 User talk:CarlFilip19 →Semi-protection templates: Reply Tag: Reply
18 March 2024
- 21:4721:47, 18 March 2024 diff hist −7 19 Kids and Counting 10 January 2021, this article was protected due to violations of the biographies of living persons policy. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted
- 21:4621:46, 18 March 2024 diff hist +10 16 Hudson 25 November 2018, this article was protected due to persistent vandalism. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted
- 21:4221:42, 18 March 2024 diff hist +9 9/11 conspiracy theories 9 December 2009, this article was protected due to excessive vandalism. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted
- 21:2621:26, 18 March 2024 diff hist +5 5 (New York City Subway service) 8 March 2024, this article was protected due to persistent sockpuppetry. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted
- 21:2621:26, 18 March 2024 diff hist +5 4 (New York City Subway service) 8 March 2024, this article was protected due to persistent sockpuppetry. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted
15 March 2024
- 20:3220:32, 15 March 2024 diff hist +27 Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is not so great 20 January 2021, this article was protected due to persistent vandalism, and for some reason this template was not added.
- 20:3120:31, 15 March 2024 diff hist +27 Nikki Haley Someone forgot the template. Tag: Reverted
14 March 2024
- 21:2921:29, 14 March 2024 diff hist +9 3D printing 15 November 2021, this article was protected due to persistent vandalism. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection.
- 21:2921:29, 14 March 2024 diff hist +9 2+2 11 March 2020, this page was protected due to persistent vandalism. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted
- 21:2621:26, 14 March 2024 diff hist +9 2 + 2 = 5 10 November 2021, this article was protected due to persistent vandalism. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted
- 21:2521:25, 14 March 2024 diff hist +5 2 (New York City Subway service) 8 March 2024, this article was protected due to persistent sockpuppetry. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted
- 21:2321:23, 14 March 2024 diff hist +5 2 28 December 2022, this article was protected due to persistent vandalism. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection.
- 21:0021:00, 14 March 2024 diff hist −91 1+1 12 September 2016, this page was protected due to persistent vandalism. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted
- 20:5320:53, 14 March 2024 diff hist +9 .org 17 May 2019, this article was protected due to persistent vandalism and other unconstructive editing. I am editing this template because people may appreciate seeing the reason for the article's protection. Tag: Reverted
12 March 2024
- 15:5815:58, 12 March 2024 diff hist +2,867 User talk:Oshwah →Regarding templates for protected pages: new section Tag: New topic
6 March 2024
- 14:5214:52, 6 March 2024 diff hist −114 Augustin-Louis Cauchy That sentence was not well written, since it used weasel wording by saying that "many saw this theorem as Cauchy's most important contribution to mathematics". Which people are "many", where is this research from, and is this sentence needed to understand the article? The sentence can come back when a reliable source supports the sentence's attribution. I am on a small streak of solving MOS:WEASEL. as in unsupported attributions.