User contributions for Wikieditswithnuance
A user with 27 edits. Account created on 1 January 2024.
29 April 2024
- 22:5222:52, 29 April 2024 diff hist +1,814 m Battle of Kursk Published refutation argument (with a source) regarding the idea the Nazis would have one if they'd only moved sooner
6 March 2024
- 17:5117:51, 6 March 2024 diff hist +432 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:0315:03, 6 March 2024 diff hist +290 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
- 03:0903:09, 6 March 2024 diff hist +244 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:5901:59, 6 March 2024 diff hist +256 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:3901:39, 6 March 2024 diff hist +201 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:2101:21, 6 March 2024 diff hist +159 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:2101:21, 6 March 2024 diff hist +530 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:1001:10, 6 March 2024 diff hist +464 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:0701:07, 6 March 2024 diff hist +176 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:0401:04, 6 March 2024 diff hist +486 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:5200:52, 6 March 2024 diff hist +576 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
- 00:4700:47, 6 March 2024 diff hist +600 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
1 March 2024
- 17:0817:08, 1 March 2024 diff hist +241 Talk:Amdocs →Controversy section: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:0617:06, 1 March 2024 diff hist +245 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
- 17:0417:04, 1 March 2024 diff hist +251 m Amdocs Added an additional reference from an official US Gov (DEA) report to the controversy sections mentioning of the potential for AMDOCS software having been used my some as an attack vector some 22 to 25 years ago
20 February 2024
- 02:5902:59, 20 February 2024 diff hist +522 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
15 February 2024
- 21:4721:47, 15 February 2024 diff hist +1,883 Talk:Amdocs →Balance and NPOV Improvements: Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:2621:26, 15 February 2024 diff hist +704 Talk:Amdocs →Controversy section: Reply Tag: Reply
13 February 2024
- 15:2615:26, 13 February 2024 diff hist +510 Talk:Amdocs →Controversy section: Reply Tag: Reply
12 February 2024
- 20:0420:04, 12 February 2024 diff hist +1,009 Talk:Amdocs →Controversy section: Reply Tag: Reply
11 February 2024
- 15:0215:02, 11 February 2024 diff hist +273 Talk:Amdocs →Controversy section: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:0115:01, 11 February 2024 diff hist +224 Amdocs Added an additional reference to the controversy sections mentioning of the potential for AMDOCS software having been used my some as an attack vector some 22 to 25 years ago
8 February 2024
- 23:0723:07, 8 February 2024 diff hist +225 Talk:Amdocs →Controversy section: Reply Tag: Reply
- 23:0623:06, 8 February 2024 diff hist +386 Amdocs Added an additional reference to the controversy sections mentioning of the potential for AMDOCS software having been used my some as an attack vector some 22 to 25 years ago
30 January 2024
- 22:0322:03, 30 January 2024 diff hist +986 Talk:Amdocs →Controversy section: Reply Tag: Reply
1 January 2024
- 17:2417:24, 1 January 2024 diff hist +928 m Amdocs I added additional information to its controversy section that reflects the nuance of the fact that while links to a foreign government's espionage were not revealed, there was indeed real reason to believe that shady things were happening with AMDOCS products, whether AMDOCS was aware of it or not
