Talk:Cumulative prospect theory

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Game theory

	This article is part of WikiProject Game theory, an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles related to Game theory. We need your help! Join in \| Fix a red link \| Add content \| Weigh inGame theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Game theoryTemplate:WikiProject Game theorygame theory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

first draft[edit]

Only a first draft, I think, but for such an important work, there should be at least something... Will work on that, when I have time. --Rieger 21:38, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

dp is correct![edit]

Since there has been some edit: dp means integrating with respect to the probability measure p, Writing the integrand as f(p)dp is wrong, first because f is undefined, so it should be p(x)dx, but second because that would allow only for absolutely continuous measures, but excludes e.g. discrete lotteries! Rieger 10:02, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"wikify"[edit]

I don't know what needs to be wikified... In my opinion the article pretty much follows the guidelines for style. Maybe there will be some clarification about what should be improved? Otherwise I would suggest to delete the "to be wikified" header. Rieger 13:47, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

weighting function[edit]

This page is good! If someone has time can they modify the graph of the weighting function: maximum x and y values are 1, and the arrows suggest the range is not limited! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.250.6.243 (talk) 01:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discrete Version[edit]

In "Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices" (with Ming Huang), American Economic Review 98, 2066-2100, December 2008. http://badger.som.yale.edu/faculty/ncb25/pwf_final.pdf , they give a discrete version, of the cumulative prospect theory, which is pretty easy to understand. Ladypine (talk) 11:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the original paper, Kahnemann and Tversky also gave a discrete version. I also think, it should be here (not replacing the continuous version, of course). Maybe somebody finds time to add it? 2.207.106.125 (talk) 06:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Parameters[edit]

There should also be something about the typical functional forms used when applying CPT and the parameter values typically measured. Somebody want to add this? 2.207.106.125 (talk) 06:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]