Talk:Ego psychology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

      • Pasted discussion from former location in the Ego, Id & Super-ego article***

Combination of id, ego, superego and ego psychology articles

I am not sure this was a very good idea. Atlhough ego psychology is a school of psychoanalysis that originated in Freud's id-ego-superego model, I think it is confusing to have the ego psychology article stuffed into the id, ego, superego article. Ego psychology is a school of thought, and the id-ego-superego is a specific model.

I agree fully with this. The "ego, superego and id" could be discussed in an article called Structural theory of psychoanalysis. Ego psychology should be its own article. /skagedal... 01:57, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

I am moving ego psychology into it's own article, which will most likely be a stub. Lacan hated ego psychology, and Freud would've hated it for its 'feel-good' bullshit so it should be elsewhere. Plus, what the hell does it have to do with the structural/topographical model of the mind?--Jordangordanier 02:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bolinli1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lacan[edit]

I have added a subsection under the Critiques of Ego-psychology as Lacan was a huge critic of this movement and his theory stood in opposition to it. His prominence in psychoanalysis and other fields of academia warrants a small mention at least. Jordangordanier 03:47, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Erikson reference[edit]

Perhaps I'm missing something, but note 11 references pages in a publication of Erikson but no book title. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.185.78 (talk) 10:05, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 131.111.185.78! No, you are not missing something. Unfortunately, this happens. At some point in the past, an editor has added the text with the incomplete link. I'll check the page history to see if that editor is still around, but otherwise, what to do? an editor added text with one full reference to Erikson's book, and one that was incomplete. The full citation got edited away and only the incomplete one was left. But anyway, it's fixed now. Lova Falk talk 10:23, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed

Oscar Pfister[edit]

Oscar Pfister, mentioned in 1.1, seems to be Swiss not Swedish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:DC:673B:1100:4D8D:4007:CE3E:6624 (talk) 15:11, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?[edit]

He didn't really state or imply that a child needs to complete an 'oral stage' [and engage in an 'anal stage'] to be subsequently 'physically active', did he? 122.151.210.84 (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]