Talk:Emotional exhaustion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2021 and 14 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Psychology Says.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lead improvements[edit]

The lead needs to summarize why it is important, beyond its connection to the now-popular usage as a phenomenological label. It may be helpful to undefensively suggest that it is not mere "pop-psych", that there is validity to the construct or even that it is an attempt to put some validity on a common experience. Also the relationship of the concept to the more-established and accepted notion of "stress" might be helpful, either in the lead or near the top of the article. I don't know that you need a definition section if there is not too much disagreement about definition. That location might be a good place to position EE relative to overlapping or otherwise related concepts (as you have with "burnout"). DCDuring 17:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too many headings[edit]

Although I like structure, the visual effect is rough. I have a particular personal dislike for a heading immediately followed by a subheading, without 3 or more lines of text intervening. Whether you need more text or fewer headings I can't say at the moment. DCDuring 17:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Depersonalization / Dehumanization[edit]

These two words refer to two entirely unrelated concepts. Could this be clarified? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.193.199.154 (talk) 01:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Emotional exhaustion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very academic[edit]

This reads less like a wikipedia article and more like a academic paper.