This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
What information in particular would people like cited (per the tag)? Christopher Parham(talk) 08:06, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
When I added it [1] there were no references at all. I think the tag can probably go now. Needs better categorisation, though. -Splashtalk 09:55, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps there should be some mention of the fact that the term Europeanisation in EU studies was coined by Robert Ladrech in 1994? 193.190.134.66 14:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can we seriously get some standardisation here? The article, against Wikipedia's unfortunate preference for American spelling of words, is "-isation" with "-ization" given as an alternative. Given that it's intrinsically a European-related (thus British, too) subject, that is understandable; but that is no excuse for the article to alternate between the two for the remainder. The article should be the same throughout, with possible alternatives given at the top and not used again. - Locuteh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.77.35.111 (talk) 21:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like the page had already been standardized to the British spelling convention of "Europeanisation", so I moved the article to that title. I do not have a preference, but it needs to be consistent. Kman543210 (talk) 01:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree British English should be used as this is a European topic, therefore the European variant of English should be used Ijanderson (talk) 11:46, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]