Talk:Frilled lizard/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 17:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I've done a copyedit, feel free to point out any changes you disagree with.
The conservation information is crammed into a single sentence in distribution; this should be expanded into its own section, especially since the IUCN mentions a lot about the effect of the pet trade on the species.

Will get to. LittleJerry (talk) 19:15, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LittleJerry, any update? AryKun (talk) 13:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Yeah, I'll get to this this weekend. LittleJerry (talk) 13:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC)~~[reply]

AryKun, done. LittleJerry (talk) 21:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've done another copyedit, mostly fixing typos and italics.
The cladogram doesn't mentions the scientific name of the species or the clade that it is representing; it's of limited use without this information.
"may weigh" → "weighs"
"may have black belly" → Is the color of the belly variable? If not, it should be just "males have a black belly"
"that may merge" → See above.
"Males may move around more" → "Males move around more" since you give statistics that suggest that males move around more
"Male lizards may assert their boundaries" → See above, presumably a frill display is the most common way of asserting territoriality.
Ref numbers refer to this version. Refs checked according to ref number generated by random number generator
Ref 12 : Verifies all claims made.
Ref 2 : Verifies all claims made
Ref 10 : Verifies cladogram
Ref 38 : Verifies all claims made.
Ref 30 : Verifies all claims made.
Rest of references are properly formatted and are to reliable sources, and seem to be properly used.
Article is well illustrated and uses properly licensed images.
Earwig is clear. AryKun (talk) 15:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed all. I can't get for context for the cladogram since it would increase vastly in size. See this LittleJerry (talk) 20:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]