Talk:Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Pharmacology High‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Section[edit]

That's correct. Merge it. The two are the same.

Actually an analog could be an agonist or an antagonist. It just means the peptide is structured similarly to the original or derived from it. Thus we cannot just "merge" it as identical subjects, but it could be combined.

Considerations:

A brief analog article leading to separate agonist and antagonist articles.
A larger comprehensive article incorporating analog, agonist, and antagonist.

Ekem 23:52, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As agonists and antagonists are different agents they have received their own articles with the rewrite. Ekem 22:15, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060401045411/http://www.kenes.com/gnrh2001/Abstracts/0112aGarnick.htm to http://www.kenes.com/gnrh2001/Abstracts/0112aGarnick.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]