Talk:Hexacene
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Article needs expert attention[edit]
The small sample of 5 of the 68 subsequent journal articles citing the 1955 JACS paper by Bailey & Liao are presented in the article, resulting in a limited and questionable summary of the synthetic, physical property, reactivity, and electronic research into this compound (all based on this small selection of primary sources). It would be better to have a single paragraph, drawn from a single text or review source, here, than to have this confusing and questionable piece of limited, interpretive WP:OR. I leave it to regulars here to decide what to do. The article is all but useless until it gets expert attention. 2601:246:C700:19D:D0D1:2941:9626:4248 (talk) 01:36, 17 February 2020 (UTC)