Talk:Imaginary Conversations

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature

Critique by Nietzsche[edit]

Nietzsche called it one of the finest examples of 19th century prose style, along with those of Emerson and, I think, Prosper Merimee, in case anyone finds that noteworthy. (5.102.254.234 (talk) 22:00, 4 March 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Untrustworthy main source[edit]

The main source for the article is supposed to be a 1900 encyclcopedia which obviously does not check its facts. It represents Landor as saying he had passed his childhood in conducting such conversations in his head, whereas it is in fact Petrarca in the work titled The Pentameron (written by Landor) who relates that fact of himself. The body of the article is thus untrustworthy and a wholly different account needs to be sustituted. Sweetpool50 (talk) 16:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]