Talk:Mark Morford

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Where does the claim that notes & errata is no longer published come from? Do they mean no longer in the print version? Online copy still exists. -- nae'blis 23:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's still printed in the hard-copy editions of the SF Chronicle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.243.149.1916 (talk) 23:22, December 13, 2006

Iconoclast[edit]

Is not the word "iconoclastic" a little too harsh for an article that isn't supposed to be biased? This is supposed to be an article written in a formal, OBJECTIVE tone, and instead, there are negative phrases all over the place. Maybe the writers need to look up "objective", "formal tone" and "iconoclastic" before continuing the article. Look them up quickly, here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Absurdliaisons (talk • contribs).

Why not ask Morford? I'm pretty sure he'd agree that he's an iconoclast. In fact, he'd probably be complemented.

Atlant 17:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the great tips!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.180.115 (talk) 00:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Douchebag[edit]

One aspect not covered in this wiki entry is the fact that Mark Morford is a huge fucking douchebag. Should this be a new "Douchebag" section, or can it just go into the existing body text? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.60.236 (talk) 19:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where did he grow up?[edit]

This article is a little too heavy on descriptions of what his writing is like, with not enough basic information (early life? birthdate and birthplace?) about the man himself. Moncrief (talk) 13:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marxist[edit]

Please stop adding the descriptor "Marxist" to this person's article. Marxists are conscientious social critics and historians. They do not believe, as Morford does (for example) that there are energy vampires whose "cords" reach through facebook to drain the life from you. 70.143.67.217 (talk) 16:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Morford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509012905/http://www.yogatreesf.com/teachers/mark_morford.htm to http://www.yogatreesf.com/teachers/mark_morford.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]