Talk:Nitrazine

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

As of now, I cannot find in the article what the colors in the various pH ranges are. H Padleckas (talk) 02:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problem: The page body states that the indicator is effective *between* 4.5 and 7.5.

The 'box' to the right says that the indicator is effective *outside* that range (Stated as 'below 4.5' and 'above 7.5').

Technically I can only say that these two statements contradict each-other.

Suggested Action: -Change the language in the 'box' to the right as follows:

 -CHANGE 'below 4.5' TO READ 'above 4.5'
 -CHANGE 'above 7.5' TO READ 'below 7.5'

Citations:

Johns Hopkins Hospital: TITLE: "pH Testing, Nitrazine Paper"

Section: 'Quality Control Procedure'

(Control samples used to test efficacy of a Nitrazine test are known to be both pH 5.0, and pH 7.0, both are *between* 4.5 and 7.5.)

Link: http://pathology.jhu.edu/department/staff/poct/selfstudy/nitrazine.pdf

Family Practice Notebook (page: Vaginal Fluid pH)

Section: 'Interpretation: Nitrazine Paper'

(Indicates that results of test are a pH *between* 4.5 and 7.5)

Link: http://www.fpnotebook.com/ob/exam/vgnlfldph.htm

This is my 1st post as an editor so I extend my most sincere apologies if I've broken any etiquette.

Haloeffectswp (talk) 10:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nitrazine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070703015100/http://cpmclabinfo.cpmc.columbia.edu/chapter/mono/pc000300.htm to http://cpmclabinfo.cpmc.columbia.edu/chapter/mono/pc000300.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]