User talk:207.28.1.66

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

Your edit to Cretaceous[edit]

Your recent edit to Cretaceous (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Vsmith 20:25, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Thomas Paine page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sciurinæ 18:32, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Thomas Paine, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sciurinæ 19:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Green Bay Packers, you will be blocked from editing. --דניאל - Dantheman531 18:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Apollo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. EALacey 16:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Russian Revolution (1917) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 18:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The recent edit you made to Russian Revolution (1917) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 18:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to AK-47, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: AK-47 was changed by 207.28.1.66 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-01-08T21:13:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Beerfest has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. BarretBonden (talk) 20:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to John Schutt. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Schutt was changed by 207.28.1.66 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-03-06T20:43:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:43, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page John Wayne Gacy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 18:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Henry David Thoreau, you will be blocked from editing. BCtalk to me 16:12, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Grant Wood worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 15:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Grant Wood has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 15:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Postville, Iowa worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Nyttend (talk) 23:16, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of anime conventions, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 21:14, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

April 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Herbert Hoover, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Herbert Hoover was changed by 207.28.1.66 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-04-07T21:43:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:43, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Grant Wood. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 18:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chives. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MartinezMD (talk) 20:12, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Whale shark has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Krashlandon (talk) 19:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jefferson Davis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ‑KoshVorlonAngeli i demoni kruzhili nado mnoj... - 19:11, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Little green rosetta. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Air mass because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer
 
16:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Province of North Carolina, you may be blocked from editing. Dennis Brown - © Join WER 20:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Province of Pennsylvania, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 19:53, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Province of Pennsylvania, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rocketrod1960 (talk) 20:53, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2013[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mont Saint-Michel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Eric talk 15:42, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Epicgenius. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Eats, Shoots & Leaves because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Epicgenius(give him tiradecheck out damage) 18:10, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jeffrd10. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Betsy Ross because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jeffrd10 (talk) 18:51, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reference Errors on 22 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Julien Dubuque may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • and memorial lie on a cliff facing the Mississippi river at the Julien Dubuque Monument in the [[Mines of Spain State Recreation Area and E. B. Lyons Nature Cen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:20, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Robert Lucas (governor), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 16:36, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grenville M. Dodge. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Epicgenius (talk) 17:58, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Orphan Wiki. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Armistice Day— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Orphan Wiki 15:43, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm FourViolas. An edit you recently made to Sampling bias seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FourViolas (talk) 21:16, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


September 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Wikiisawesome. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Doncaster Rovers F.C.— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. /wia /talk 20:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Doncaster Rovers F.C. with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. /wia /talk 20:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Doncaster Rovers F.C. with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. /wia /talk 20:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Doncaster Rovers F.C.. /wia /talk 20:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Guatemala—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:14, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Texas Longhorn, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MoonlightVector 19:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm TheImaCow. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dezmon Patmon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. --TheImaCow (talk) 20:17, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Felida97. An edit you recently made to R seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Felida97 (talk) 16:25, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dialmayo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Slipped capital femoral epiphysis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Dialmayo (talk) (Contribs) she/her 19:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.