User talk:66.250.190.117

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Comments: 6 month block

Your edit to Brian Dawkins[edit]

Your recent edit to Brian Dawkins (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 18:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007[edit]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to World Wrestling Entertainment. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bmg916 Speak to Me 15:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning


April 2007[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, you will be blocked from editing. - Denny 16:48, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. - Alison 16:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. -SCEhardT 15:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to 341 California (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Scientific superpowers, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ratiocinate (tc) 20:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

September 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Juelz Santana, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Professor marginalia 19:54, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Juelz Santana. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Professor marginalia 20:07, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Lil Wayne, you will be blocked from editing. Professor marginalia 20:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
DO NOT CONTINUE vandalizing articles as you did to Hope (ship). Aboutmovies 18:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Sharon Pratt Kelly:[edit]

Your recent edit to Sharon Pratt Kelly (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 19:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Name. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Melsaran (talk) 13:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Paleontology, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Paleontology was changed by 66.250.190.117 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-10-12T17:03:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 17:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of geologists, you will be blocked from editing. Professor marginalia 17:10, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cytoplasm, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cytoplasm was changed by 66.250.190.117 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-10-23T17:21:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 17:21, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Vandalism to Cytoplasm[edit]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cytoplasm, you will be blocked from editing. Your changes have been automatically reverted by CounterVandalismBot. If this is a mistake, please report it. Thank you. CounterVandalismBot 17:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Cryogenics, you will be blocked from editing. --Oxymoron83 15:11, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wknight94 (talk) 15:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Crime fiction has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας discussion 18:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kazaam. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kazaam was changed by 66.250.190.117 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-07T18:50:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Kazaam. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. The Helpful One 18:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 156.34.218.194 (talk) 14:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Angela Davis (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 1993, you will be blocked from editing. Shalom (HelloPeace) 20:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Denzel Washington has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 18:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to American Dream has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. The Helpful One (Review) 20:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to 16th Street Baptist Church bombing (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning[edit]

If you continue to vandalize pages as you did to "Whopper" and other articles mentioned above your IP address will be blocked from using Wikipedia. House of Scandal (talk)

You have been blocked for a period of 6 months from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Jmlk17 18:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Helen Keller has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. abf /talk to me/ 15:07, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Francisco Vázquez de Coronado constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. VasilievV 2 19:17, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to History of medicine has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 15:03, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Gospel Music Workshop of America has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Keilana|Parlez ici 20:02, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Child abuse has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. RazorICE 14:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to The Tempest constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 12:46, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pangaea has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tomayres (talk) 17:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Pangaea, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 17:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to GWAR. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nouse4aname (talk) 19:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ralph Nader. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Say Headcheese!--hexaChord2 19:06, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Weathering has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab 19:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Civil Disobedience (Thoreau), you will be blocked from editing. --Midnightdreary (talk) 15:18, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Chief financial officer. Marek.69 talk 17:40, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 year as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Hiberniantears (talk) 17:53, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jason Campbell, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jason Campbell was changed by 66.250.190.117 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-01-12T19:29:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Jennette McCurdy. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. The Thing Vandalize me 17:28, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Drunk driving in the United States. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Az29 (talk) 18:16, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked for a period of 1 year from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoygabsadds 18:07, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]