User talk:Bdatruthwriter

Welcome!

Hello, Bdatruthwriter, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 02:30, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling[edit]

I'll be clear: if I see you convert an article from American spelling to British spelling again for a topic that is not clearly British, you will be blocked immediately. People that use American spellings are not idiots, and we do not permit editors to convert articles from one spelling to another based on personal preference.—Kww(talk) 04:00, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are a fucking idiot and fuck you pal. If you block me, I WILL SIGN UP AGAIN UNDER ANOTHER ACCOUNT AND USE ONE OF THE MANY IP ADDRESSES AT MY DISPOSAL. I WILL CONTINUE TO CORRECT MISSPELLED WORDS AS I SEE IT. GET OVER IT!

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing and personal attacks. Any admin can unblock this editor when he agrees to abide by WP:ENGVAR. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 04:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bdatruthwriter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My actions did not violate policy and could not be described as disrupted. I was blocked when I sought clarification on editing guidelines. Bdatruthwriter (talk) 12:58, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've made your intentions perfectly clear with the racist personal attack in your previous edit. No thanks. Kuru (talk) 13:11, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.