User talk:Discopup

Discopup, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Discopup! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Horizon (web series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Perry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Amalfi Coast. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 03:27, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me I take offence to you reverting my edits here. There are other popular culture references in the Amalfi Coast article that are not referenced. Why have yiu not deleted them? Here is a source for my inclusion of this movie to the popular culture section of this Wikipedia page. https://www.timeout.com/movies/kath-and-kimderella it would be appreciated if you could reinstate my changes to this page! Discopup (talk) 08:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nick Tate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sons and Daughters. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

excuse me what are you referring to? I have NOT vandalized pages by introducing incorrect information...please do not defame me without any details. What pages are you accusing me of vandalizing? Discopup (talk) 21:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked back at the edit history of some pages I have recently edited and see you have reverted references I made to Leonardo DiCaprio playing a young Mason Capwell... how do you regard this as vandalism... I referenced this from mention of this on the main Santa Barbara Wikipedia page where it states "n 1990, Leonardo DiCaprio received a Best Young Actor in a Daytime Series Nomination at the 12th Youth in Film Awards for his appearance as a young Mason Capwell." This was no NEW info I was trying to insert ...I was merely connecting the dots of DiCaprio's role as the young Mason Capwell onto pages that didn't reference it. Can you please advise how this is regarded as vandalism and I would appreciate you not 🚭 throwing around such malicious accusations against other Wikipedia editors who are merely doing edits in good faith. Discopup (talk) 22:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And have done some research now ...quick Google search of Leonardo DiCaprio and Mason Capwell brings up many entries confirming Leonardo playing a young Mason Capwell in 1990 such as on IMDB and also here http://santabarbara-online.com/articleLDiCaprio2.htm so I don't see how you can accuse me of vandalism...if anything you are the one vandalizing correct information I put on the pages! Discopup (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb is not a valid source, per WP:IMDb, nor are fan sites and/or Wikipedia itself acceptable, either. Adding information, without citing a source is not acceptable, either, and you've continued to do this throughout your editing history on this encyclopedia, dating back to 2020. And for you to assume I don't assume good faith in you not assuming it, as well. An editor, editing since 2013, should be well aware of all of this. livelikemusic (TALK!) 21:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia defines good faith editing as "f criticism is needed, discuss editors' actions, but avoid accusing others of harmful motives." You are definitely not following these principles in accusing me of vandalism. Have a good day! Discopup (talk) 04:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some other sources of Leonardo DiCaprio playing the young Mason Capwell.

https://www.heraldweekly.com/90s-and-00s-child-stars-who-actually-turned-out-alright-and-those-who-didnt/2

https://www.thelist.com/1290882/classic-soap-leondardo-dicaprio-show-biz-start/

https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/death-coma-or-the-revolving-door-trick-what-now-for-ridge-20120815-247n6.html

https://www.buzzfeed.com/erinlarosa/19-surprising-celebs-who-got-their-start-on-soap-operas

https://brightside.me/articles/11-reasons-to-fall-in-love-with-leonardo-dicaprio-even-more-799947/

And the list goes on and on. For me I think it is irrefutable that Leonardo DiCaprio played the young Mason Capwell so I stand by my assertion of you calling my edits here as vandalism is not valdi. How is it vandalism? Yes I should have put some citations to the edit but as I saw reference to Leonardo DiCaprio playing the role in the main Santa Barbara page I thought was not needed. Will do so in future. But these edits by myself was most definitely done in good faith so I do take offence to your comments. According to Wikipedia guidelines if you disagree with another editor you are to raise the matter for discussion not accusing other editors of harmful motives. Discopup (talk) 04:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]