User talk:Inal-mn

This is Inal-mn's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Circassians in Poland (October 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Circassians in Poland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 08:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inal-mn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 08:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Circassians in Poland (November 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nagol0929 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Circassians in Poland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nagol0929 (talk) 15:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Please do not add or change information in article without citing reliable sources. Please review Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research, which are part of Wikipedia's core policies. In cases where you disagree with information that is already supported by citations, it is usually better to open a discussion with other editors by explaining the problem on the article's talk page first.

Also, please do not upload images you found on the internet to Wikipedia articles. All images you find online are protected by copyright unless otherwise indicated. Wikipedia only accepts images that are released under certain compatible licenses; for more information, see Wikipedia:Image use policy and Commons:Licensing). It's also not helpful, in most cases, to add modern fictional representations of historical person or events to Wikipedia articles, especially without any context clearly explaining the origin of the image. R Prazeres (talk) 17:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Circassians in Poland[edit]

Hello, Inal-mn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Circassians in Poland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Air on White. I noticed that in this edit to Russo-Circassian War, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Air on White (talk) 05:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i have provided a document on how they have helped the Russians empire and that guy keeps removing it Inal-mn (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Russo-Circassian War. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Air on White (talk) 09:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will have a discussion with him I guess Inal-mn (talk) 09:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for a period of 72 hours for disruptive editing including edit warring (even violating the three revert bright line rule), and for repeatedly treating interactions with other editors as a WP:BATTLEGROUND. You've been communicating poorly and too aggressively. Now, I'm not saying that your content opponent/s are entirely blameless, but you need to understand that the conduct you've exhibited is not a sustainable in the long-term for the collaborative international project that is the English Wikipedia. Additionally, this article and dispute fall under Wikipedia's Contentious topic regime, which brings with it enhanced restrictions and scrutiny. More on that at the alert below, please review it carefully. Thank you. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 12:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. El_C 12:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]