User talk:Niashervin

This is Niashervin's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Direct electron detector (December 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Direct electron detector and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 20:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Niashervin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 20:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not charge density[edit]

@Niashervin, I noticed that you have been going through and changing "electron density" to "charge density" for cryoEM. Sorry, but it is really the electrostatic potential V(r) that is measured from both the nuclear & electron terms in cryoEM, see for instance Cowleys' Diffraction Physics. The charge density kind-off comes out as a zero-order approximation for out of focus imaging, but is not general, see the links in Contrast transfer function. Technically it is electron density for xrd as they don't see the charge. Ldm1954 (talk) 15:57, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, electrostatic potential is more correct than charge density. The article I was editing needed some major revisions so I wasn't worrying too much on specific wording yet. I'll change the phrasing to electrostatic potential maps on the next iteration. Thanks for bringing it up! Niashervin (talk) 18:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Direct electron detector[edit]

Hello, Niashervin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Direct electron detector, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nion Company (May 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Seattle Times, Scientific American mention the company very, very briefly in passing. Nature article is published by subject making it non-independent. Wiley source is OK but needs more than just one source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nion Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 23:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]