User talk:Wolfchild

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Wolfchild, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ardenn 18:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Green Party of Ontario[edit]

The issues I have with your edits are:

None of your edits are verified
As for the Dalton/poll issue, it should be cited as well. Ardenn 05:25, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with those few POV statements being changed or removed. Ardenn 05:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Toronto municipal election, 2006[edit]

As a you were listed in the edit history of the article, I wanted to pass along a comment I added to the talk page which may be of interest. — MrDolomite | Talk 03:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vaughan Municipal Election, 2006[edit]

Hey, I just wanted to thank you for adding those results grids to the Vaughan Election page! I'm totally useless with charts on wiki, so thanks a lot, it looks much more organized now. -- Chabuk 16:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem. Trying to clean up several municipal election pages now that nominations are essentially closed. Wolfchild 04:06, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Polls[edit]

Ok, let me explain myself. Firstly, I wanted to keep the "unknown" poll in there, because in my opinion, the results seemed pretty acurate (they are consistent with other polls in that time frame). That is why I want(ed) it included. We should at least keep the 2005 poll, as we do know who made it. Also, I hope you dont mind removing the fringe candidates, as they just clutter things up, and none of them have received over 1% anyways. Just think of the insanity if every candidate was listed in the Toronto election. -- Earl Andrew - talk 07:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know if they are doing any prompting. I know when I do political polls, I rarely prompt, but I've never done a municipal poll though. -- Earl Andrew - talk 03:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richmond Hill municipal election, 2006[edit]

Thanks for making this article! I'm preparing for some advanced voting (I'm ward 5) and having all the links available for the candidate will help in evaluating who to choose. With so many candidates available it was very confusing. Tyciol 19:20, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. It was fun (in its own way). Wolfchild 06:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please update the page. The election was 2 weeks ago, remember to change the language to past tense. Thanks, PKT 00:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Math Patrol screenshot.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Math Patrol screenshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Math Patrol[edit]

Hello Wolfchild, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Math Patrol, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:204.112.28.128. This has been done because the page is either pure vandalism or a blatant hoax (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:204.112.28.128. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 204.112.28.128 (talk · contribs) 18:04, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rob Newman (politician)[edit]

The article Rob Newman (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnotable unelected politician. WP:NPOL, WP:POLOUTCOMES, and MOS:CA#Politics.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Madg2011 (talk) 22:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]