Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1903 Albany College football team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Clearly no consensus to delete, but there is consensus to retain the content in some form. Whether it should be as an article or perhaps merged somewhere into a list remains open. Mojo Hand (talk) 03:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1903 Albany College football team[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't meet the WP:NSEASONS and has a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Team compiled an ordinary 4-3 record. Let'srun (talk) 02:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, American football, and Oregon. Let'srun (talk) 02:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A search of Newspapers.com turns up a good deal of coverage. I've added a few pieces. Cbl62 (talk) 03:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's one to have a one-off season article like this. I'd suggest merging this to a decade list article, but that doesn't exist. But having an ordinary record isn't an issue... SportingFlyer T·C 10:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Cbl62 (talk) 16:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Cbl62. Jweiss11 (talk) 05:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per above. Passes GNG. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Lewis & Clark Pioneers football. This now-Division III team is not significant enough to need individual season articles. Reywas92^Talk 16:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- By what measure is it "not significant enough"? BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There is enough coverage to support an article. It might be better to group coverage of this particular team into decades rather than seasons, but that's an editorial question. The sources present in the article support notability. Eluchil404 (talk) 00:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.