Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Spain Pilatus PC-6 crash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:07, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Spain Pilatus PC-6 crash[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non Notable Event - Fails WP:NEVENT and WP is not a newspaper, no lasting significance claimed or demonstrated. LGA _talk^edits 09:15, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as somebody who proposed deletion in 2008 as a non-notable accident, nothing much changed it is still not notable. MilborneOne (talk) 12:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. MilborneOne (talk) 12:23, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, because WP:EVENT and WP:NOTNEWS are indeed not met: There has not been any follow-up coverage (which would indicate some kind of lasting impact). The article is purely based on (one) initial news story.--FoxyOrange (talk) 13:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Was made up for voting for delete until I came across the aircraft involved in the incident was in a live Honda advert the day before the crash so I edited the article to include this, so please relook at the article to see if it may be worth keeping. Hjay50 (talk) 20:52, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Still not seeing any claim to lasting significance, the link to the Honda advert is at best WP:TRIVA and not actually related to the accident. LGA _talk^edits 08:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete. No lasting significance. The article explicitly states that there was no connection between the Honda advert and the accident, other than the coincidence of the same plane being used. Had the plane been doing something for the advert other than exact same thing it did every time it took skydivers skydiving and an official report had stated this was a factor in the accident then it might have some bearing on notability. It didn't though, so it doesn't. Thryduulf (talk) 11:02, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, An unfortunately common type of light aircraft accident with no lasting consequences. No changes in procedures, training, no airworthiness directives issues, no service bulletins or similar. Fails to meet the Wikipedia policy for inclusion WP:NOTNEWSPAPER. - Ahunt (talk) 23:45, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.