Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Lincoln vs. Zombies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Bencherlite ^Talk 08:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham Lincoln vs. Zombies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable new film. Orange Mike | Talk 23:11, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:56, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per topic meeting WP:NF and having enough sources available for our use, even if not used (yet) in the article, to show the topic as notable.[1][2] Addresable issues of simply requiring improvement rarely require deletion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not sure if it's notable (though Dread Central[3] and Starburst[4] reviews are certainly substantial coverage in reliable sources), although more sources may follow, but could merge with The Asylum (the production company behind this and other terrible cash-ins). --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Now improved. As well as Dread Central[5] and Starburst[6], there's an article from Onion AV Club and material on the production from Savannah Morning News. We now have info on both production and reception. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:GNG. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Red-Blue-White (talk) 21:06, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
just sharing - one non-notable blogger's review described this film as "the worst thing to happen to Lincoln in a theater since Our American Cousin!" --Orange Mike | Talk 21:14, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. In real life, Lincoln did pick a bad evening to go watch that play. Could you share the link? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:23, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - all the issues on sourcing are addressable. Bearian (talk) 00:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.