Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autistic Pride Day

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 09:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Autistic Pride Day[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most sources don't cover Autistic Pride Day in depth, and it is hard to find reliable sources on it. Ylevental (talk) 20:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Another bad faith nomination by this user. 203.17.215.22 (talk) 08:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please give actual reasons. Ylevental (talk) 12:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did. You are acting in bad faith. 203.17.215.22 (talk) 00:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then why did the other person propose a weak delete? Ylevental (talk) 00:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete unless notable sources can be found. I personally have never heard of such event. Nordic Dragon 08:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Keep. Plenty of notable sources on Google, most of which can be incorporated in the article. Nordic Dragon 08:42, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I didn't look hard enough. But it's always good to double-check. Ylevental (talk) 12:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 08:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Nordic Dragon 58.162.201.207 (talk) 04:11, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.