Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bajram Limani

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 04:18, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bajram Limani[edit]

Bajram Limani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized ("his supporters praise him for his dedication to public service and his efforts to improve the lives of citizens in the region") WP:BLP of a political figure not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL. The claim here is that he has been deputy director of the municipal branch of a political party in one city, which is not an "inherently" notable role that confers a free pass over NPOL -- but the sourcing is not adequate to get him over WP:GNG, as it consists of short blurbs and a brief WP:BLP1E blip of single-day coverage in the context of having been a casual bystander near somebody else doing something, which is not in and of itself a reason why a local political organizer would pass the ten year test as a topic of special significance over and above other local political organizers. Bearcat (talk) 15:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 17:19, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.