Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Chandighat (1771)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Chandighat (1771)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails to meet WP:GNG. None of the Reliable Sources referenced mention the "Battle of Chandighat (1771)," nor has any historian referred to it as such. The title is an invented designation for a military conflict that occurred at a location referred to as "X." Therefore, the article was titled "Battle of X," which is entirely inappropriate. Moreover, the content within the article is so sparse that it could easily be incorporated into one of the parent articles. Imperial ^[AFCND] 10:59, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I do not find any discussion of any “battle of Chandighat” in any sources. Mccapra (talk) 12:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as least 2 sources in the article fails wp:v, looks like way to much OR. Slatersteven (talk) 14:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttarakhand-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not a whole lot of possibility to verify from the sources. What somewhat source are there, have no coverage on Chandighat battle and unrelated to the topic of the page and does not support the material being presented. RangersRus (talk) 15:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.