Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Hunter and Lee McDermott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Desperate Housewives characters. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:20, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Hunter and Lee McDermott[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite covering two characters, there is no reception section. Development section is built from passing mentions, and most of the article is a plot summary referenced to the episodes of the TV show. My BEFORE didn't show any source that meets WP:SIGCOV, just a few plot summaries. At best, I recommend redirecting this to List of Desperate Housewives characters. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Television, Sexuality and gender, and United States of America. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into List of Desperate Housewives characters, keeping all sourced statements from the "Development and casting" sections, and trimming plot summaries. --LoЯd ۞pεth 18:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as article is well sourced as it has 30 sources. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:11, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
30 almost entirely bad sources, most to the show itself, are not an arguyment for keeping, but for removal. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:04, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into List of Desperate Housewives characters per rationales provided by discussion participants above. The information, condensed to what is relevant to an encyclopedia, will fit snugly there. BD2412 T 01:02, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.