Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Care of residents

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I've moved the article to Residential care as well. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 00:45, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Care of residents[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially unreferenced synthesis. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 04:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:25, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Unsure~~ It seems like this could be a useful article about residential care (which seems to be the preferred term at Google; the author of this article made "residential care" into a redirect to this article, but I found almost no examples of usage of the term "care of residents"). The article is well organized, concise, and factual. We do have a comparable article on Home care. But this article as it stands is entirely unsourced. Let me see if I can find any sourcing. --MelanieN (talk) 17:47, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've added sourcing and am continuing to do so. I think the article has encyclopedic merit. Its name should be changed to Residential care (an administrator will have to do that, since Residential care currently exists as a redirect to this article). --MelanieN (talk) 19:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Very sourceable topic. I know books I have used to source other related articles would just as easily be able to source this one. (Note to Melanie N. If you want to boldly move this, you db-move)Tatterfly (talk) 04:26, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Tatterfly. Unfortunately I can't move it to a name that already exists. That's why I said it needs an administrator, to delete the existing redirect page Residential care so this article can be moved there. --MelanieN (talk) 14:37, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the full explanation on my talk page. I will do this if the article is kept. --MelanieN (talk) 23:14, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

comment the original issue is that this is a synthesis of topics already covered by their own article. Each " section" already has an article. As such, this is an unnecessary synthesis of those topics. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 05:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see this as an article with surmountable problems. The OR and synthesis can be cleaned up. It doesn't have to be done in just 7 days either. Given the length of this article, I see that as a project that could take months at least. The format is laid out so well, I could see the problem as very solvable. Tatterfly (talk) 12:45, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep , but change the title yo Residential care the present one is awkward, and not what anyone would normally say. It's not a synthesis, but a summary. There will certainly be enough references, considering that multiple textbooks have been written about each part of this. DGG ( talk ) 21:44, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.