Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chief Performance Officer

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 February 6.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 19:03, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chief Performance Officer[edit]

Concept is a neologism from a book by a non-notable author. Search reveals no notable company on earth that has a person in this position. UnitedStatesian 14:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I also notice that there's a conflict of interest - the editor who created the article, Apolitano, also wrote the book. --Charlene 16:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; the chief point of the page seems to be to link the author's website. Commend the author for writing reasonably clearly, a perennial problem with these business management consultant topics. (Though I'm at a bit of a loss to imagine what a person compared to a heads-up for the CEO means). - Smerdis of Tlön 17:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Addhoc 23:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Weak keep for now - the above searches appear to indicate this content could be salvageable. Addhoc 23:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Quarl ^(talk) 05:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Anything that starts with "A term popularized in 2003" means that I should have heard of it in order to be notable. Otherwise, it's NN Hobbeslover ^{talk/contribs} 09:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable and unverifiable due to lack of sources. CiaranG 09:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.