Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cystic, mucinous, and serous neoplasms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:56, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cystic, mucinous, and serous neoplasms[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an excessively broad and unhelpful article title. It does not serve a useful purpose to readers, who are actually better off with this article being removed and using a search engine to fine the article they actually want. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a coherent topic or useful as a navigational tool PainProf (talk) 21:25, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This is actually a group of tumors which are usually combined together in a single category in the literature like here. That's why Arcadian created this page. This is not OR. However, given no significant content on the page, deleting it would not do much harm. My very best wishes (talk) 02:40, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) That is not the literature, its a clinical code... its like having a page like Headache (NOS), the reason they are created is technical but you couldn't ever have a page write a page about it - it isn't a discrete topic and it doesn't have greater meaning. I think probably they just went through creating indiscriminate pages that are listed in clinical code books. PainProf (talk) 02:51, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, my mistake. Delete. My very best wishes (talk) 04:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.