Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Andollo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 10:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deborah Andollo[edit]

Deborah Andollo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not my field really, but there does not seem to be a Reliable source DGG ( talk ) 22:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, per WP:GNG/WP:BASIC - I've added a 2001 CNN profile (which includes the commentary about how she "can free dive more than 100 meters on one breath. This exceeds the depth most World War II submarines could descend before imploding"), an in-depth 2012 profile from a Cuban news source, a brief 2021 McClatchy reference, and in my general review of other sources, it appears that Andollo is cited as the record that other divers are trying to beat. This article would benefit from revision and additional sources, but notability appears to be established, at minimum per WP:ANYBIO due to setting world records (a well-known and significant award or honor) and it appears likely that additional sources exist. Beccaynr (talk) 23:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Beccaynr and WP:ANYBIO. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Beccaynr (talk) 23:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.