Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotional aperture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK#1, the nominator withdrew their nomination and there are no outstanding "delete" !votes. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 21:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emotional aperture[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to have been created by academic to promote their paper. I couldn't establish that it is a WP:NOTABLE topic. Boleyn (talk) 13:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It seemed easy to establish that it was a notable topic. See The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship, for example. Andrew D. (talk) 17:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination withdrawn I've looked again and this is clearly my error. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:21, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.