Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ending poverty in all its forms everywhere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sustainable Development Goals. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:36, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ending poverty in all its forms everywhere[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Because this goal is already well explained on the Sustainable Development Goals page already and we don't need to create a separate page for each one of the goals, also the title is unwieldy, so due to these factors, i recommend this article for deletion. --RuleTheWiki (talk) 16:50, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The more common formulation of this goal uses "end" rather than "ending":

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:19, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:28, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:28, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Sustainable Development Goals. This is a slogan, and Wikipedia does not permit WP:PROMOTION, however wholly commendable the cause. Oh, and by the way, Ending poverty would in any case be a more appropriate title, eliminating the tautological repetitions – eliminating something necessarily requires that it be removed in all its forms, everywhere (otherwise it wouldn't be eliminated). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:52, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --RuleTheWiki (talk) 08:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - it's already covered, yet additional sources and notes could improve the article. Bearian (talk) 20:53, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.