Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eve of Dreams
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 22:48, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Eve of Dreams[edit]
- Eve of Dreams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable book by non-notable author. Possibly a hoax. AniMate 07:12, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Normally, I would !vote "keep", but as this article was created by a new user WHO I think wouldn't improve the article and it is a hoax, I am !voting delete. It's non-notable per WP:N.--RyRy5 (talk) 07:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: article may be a hoax and is not sourced per WP:V. Mh29255 (talk) 07:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am new to Wikipedia, I have no intentions of displaying inappropriate content. Being that the article about Eve of Dreams is entirely factual and inspired by many fan's interests, I hope that you will reconsider allowing the article to remain. I will be more than happy to continue to update the article with references. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdog717 (talk • contribs) 07:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable, not verifiable, not published yet Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:BK. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 11:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non notable and non verifiable as I found nil on Google web/news/scholar/books relevant to this. No mention of author on my library based bio resource. Dlohcierekim 23:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable; virtually nothing on Google and fails WP:BK. — Wenli (reply here) 02:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:35, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.