Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Existence

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Interesting argument (aka April fools nom). TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:52, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Existence[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This irretrievably fails WP:NPOV and WP:WEIGHT, to the point that it's impossible to write a neutral article. Simply put, the only sources we have are existing ones; even though this purports to cover both existence and nonexistence, there are absolutely no nonexistent sources here to counterbalance those which do exist. Furthermore, even if we did begin to use nonexistent sources they'd still fail WP:V, and any we could verify would by definition have to exist. Therefore, Wikipedia would be better off applying TNT to this mess at least until we can find a workaround enabling us to include nonexistent sources. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 05:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep nominator has obviously not even looked at the invisible and incorporeal list of nonexistent references. – Teratix ₵ 06:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:IAR. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge The Matrix, did you know that in 2012 there was an robot uprising so we live in the matrix now Wkc19 :) (talk) 10:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Seems inherently circular (albeit not WP:CIRCULAR), since sources that prove that the concept of existence exists, exist. At least that is what I think. --bonadea contributions talk 10:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an obvious WP:HOAX —Pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 15:05, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clear lack of notability. There is no meaning to existence. Every breath we take, we move one step closer to our demise. We live our lives killing time, as time kills us. Dark Knight 2149 17:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE: WP:MILL encyclopedia article. Also fails WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:RELIABLE (fails to predict earthquakes), WP:ALPHABETJAMBLESBELONGINWIKIPEDIAARTICLES, and WP:PORNBIO. J 947^{'s public account} _{Merry Christmas (it is Christmas, right?)} 20:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.