Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional and semi-fictional depictions of ECT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Electroconvulsive therapy. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional and semi-fictional depictions of ECT[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of trivia. ECT has been depicted in hundreds if not thousands of books, movies and television shows, but the ECT article is better served by a section examining the treatment of the subject in such media than by a separate page listing all the examples an editor can think of. PacificBoy 21:37, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Electroconvulsive therapy, since that's where this information belongs (though as a much shorter list) 65.94.253.16 (talk) 05:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This will be limited to such depictions within works that are notable in Wikipedia . I doubt there will be more than a hundred, but however many there might be, we can handle them. If it covered every such depiction every produced, that would be another matter. DGG ( talk ) 00:21, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I would limit it to those few works where the ETC depiction is significantly discussed in secondary sources. In which case a paragraph in the main article should be adequate. Otherwise we are dealing with a lot of original research. --Bejnar (talk) 05:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge then Delete. Merge back to Electroconvulsive therapy, from which it is a content fork. Whoever forked it out should know that "cleaning" an article by forking is against consensus. Abductive (reasoning) 19:33, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.