Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology[edit]
- Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I am not seeing sources dealing specifically with this book, nor is it written in an encyclopedic tone. MBisanz talk 09:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep = The tone is pretty bad, but it meets criterion 4 for the notability of books (being used for instruction at multiple universities). Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 02:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I added a quote from a reliably-published secondary source (an academic journal article by Bettina Arnold) indicating the significance of this book. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:33, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, It seems to meet WP:BK #4 as a google search shows http://www.google.com/search?q=Frauds%2C+Myths%2C+and+Mysteries%3A+Science+and+Pseudoscience+in+Archaeology+site%3A.edu&btnG=Search&hl=en&sa=2 . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smallman12q (talk • contribs) 21:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep with respects to the nom whom I greatly respect, being required reading at college and univeristies meets the inclusion requirements. Any concerns with article format should be addressed by WP:CLEANUP, not deletion. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per above.--Sloane (talk) 22:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.