Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Here Anonymous

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Eulogies (band). Mgm|^(talk) 09:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here Anonymous[edit]

Tried speedy but was stopped by another editor. This is a non-notable future release of an album. Clearly doesn't meet WP:NOTE and WP:MUSIC criteria. Cerejota (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move to userspace. Minimal coverage at present. Move to userspace until significant coverage is found.--Michig (talk) 19:18, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Too soon for article. -- Darth Mike (join the dark side) 21:01, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep is even better than userfy, there's already reviews out there: [1] or [2] Additional sources can be found plenty: [3] And Apr 7 is not that far away as someone might think... --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 00:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The second one above is a press release, not a review. I couldn't find any other significant coverage of the album in the other Google results.--Michig (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge what little sourced info there is into the parent article, and redirect this one, as a plausible search term, to Eulogies (band). There is not enough significant coverage reliable, third-party, sources to warrant a stand alone article per WP:MUSIC#Albums & WP:CRYSTAL at this time. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 00:33, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:05, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge but after deleting most of the material. This topic is not notable. I also think that the (self-published) sources from the band's own site are not sufficient to justify including the material. However, there is a single third-party source I found: [4]. I was unable to find any more sources. I would recommend reducing this article to a single sentence and then merging. Cazort (talk) 00:33, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Bosch! erm, Merge to the band article, no significant coverage thus far. pablo_hablo. 00:50, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.