Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Italygate conspiracy theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Italygate conspiracy theory[edit]

Italygate conspiracy theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't seem notable enough to be its own topic, given the shortage of sources actually covering the subject. Since their ideologies are practically the same (the article itself describes this theory as "QAnon-adjacent", I think this article should be merged to the main QAnon article, with the appropriate content to go with it. Love of Corey (talk) 23:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:16, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agree due to above reasons, just I'd prefer to see this in Attempts to overturn the 2020 Election, but I'm indifferent on which article.InvadingInvader (talk) 21:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment as creator: I am inclined to agree to a merge but keeping the current page as a redirect (Italygate and Italy gate both link there as redirects). I don't think the QAnon article is the best to merge it into (not all of the references mention it); I'd also prefer to merge into Attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election. – Bangalamania (talk) 21:50, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Six months after first reporting,[1] ongoing and deepening international RS coverage;[2][3][4][5][6] satisfies EVENT.

References

  1. ^ Caldera, Camille (8 January 2021). "Fact check: Claims of electoral fraud in Rome, dubbed 'ItalyGate,' are baseless". USA TODAY.
  2. ^ "'Italygate' election conspiracy theory was pushed by two firms led by woman who also falsely claimed $30 million mansion was hers". Washington Post. 19 June 2021.
  3. ^ "The craziest conspiracy theory out of Trump's White House - CNN Video". 17 June 2021.
  4. ^ "Analysis - 'Pure insanity': Here's perhaps the craziest election fraud conspiracy the Trump team pushed". Washington Post. 15 June 2021.
  5. ^ "Usa, Nyt: «Trump voleva che Fbi indagasse su teoria complottista Italygate»". Il Sole 24 ORE (in Italian). 6 June 2021.
  6. ^ Sarcina, Giuseppe (5 June 2021). "Italygate, la teoria (falsa) dei voti truccati via satellite da Obama e Renzi per far vincere Biden". Corriere della Sera (in Italian).
Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 22:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as I don't see a good merge target - QAnon is only adjacent and already quite large. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:21, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per GNG demonstrated by Goldsztajn. The theory's claims are much less important than the story of its origin and promotion. A good article will give context to future developments.HouseOfChange (talk) 17:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Keep: Has more than sufficient references in WP:RS over at least 6 months (January - June 2021) to meet WP:GNG. Banana Republic (talk) 19:47, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, looks to meet WP:GNG.--Surv1v4l1st Talk|Contribs 02:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.