Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ix (Oz)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Queen Zixi of Ix. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:55, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ix (Oz)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:SIGCOV to meet Wikipedia's WP:NOTABILITY guideline. There are trivial mentions, but nothing to build an article that is WP:NOT just WP:PLOT details. Cannot be improved because there isn't significant enough coverage in reliable independent secondary sources that can provide out-of-universe context. Jontesta (talk) 04:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 04:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Queen Zixi of Ix. Poorly referenced plot summary, fails WP:GNG as written. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Literature. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Queen Zixi of Ix - A perma-stub that is mostly made up of in-universe plot information, and does not have sufficient sources to justify a separate article. Redirecting it to the book where it was focused on would make sense, though. Taking a quick look, it does not appear that there is any information on this page that is not also present somewhere in that article already, so merging would not be needed. Rorshacma (talk) 15:19, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge with Queen Zixi of Ix while establishing a section for the settings in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE. --Rtkat3 (talk) 18:12, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - The topic fails GNG, so it doesn't need to exist as its own article. The above target makes sense for redirection. TTN (talk) 19:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.