Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LRG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted. — JIP | Talk 04:56, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lice Research Group[edit]

Not sure if this is vanity or a hoax. No references found on Google. Groeck 04:02, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Too vague to possibly expand if kept. -Nameneko 06:07, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Given the author's contribution history, I think we can assume hoax. -- RHaworth 07:06, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Jwissick ^(t)^(c) 07:24, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The fact that the LRG researches lice & woodlice -- which a bit of study will show are two entirely unrelated groups of animals (one's an insect, the other is a crustacean) -- shouts hoax to me. Considering that the institute is located in Arlen, Texas, maybe Boomhauer works there. Let's close this as a Speedy delete. -- llywrch 00:08, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion implemented JoJan 19:00, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.